Regional distribution of carbon intensity and its driving factors in China: an empirical study based on provincial data

• Autorzy: Wu R. , Dong J. , Zhou L. , Zhang L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The regional distribution and driving factors of total carbon emissions have been the focus of considerable research. However, carbon intensity rather than total carbon emissions has been selected as the emissions reduction index in China. The Chinese government has committed to reducing carbon intensity by 60-65% from 2005 levels. Currently, limited academic attention has been given to the regional distribution and driving factors of carbon intensity. To explore the means of achieving the carbon intensity target in China, Gini coefficients were employed in this paper to investigate regional differences in carbon intensity across 30 provinces from 1995 to 2014. Moreover, the FGLS (feasible generalized least squares) method was applied to identify the key influencing factors of carbon intensity at the national and three regional levels. The results indicate that: 1. Chinese inter-provincial Gini coefficients of carbon intensity have increased steadily in recent years, which indicates that the difference in carbon intensity between provinces in China has widened. 2. Economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade openness were negatively correlated with carbon intensity. Conversely, coal consumption, industrial proportion, and urbanization were positively correlated with carbon intensity. Moreover, urbanization has proven to be the most important factor affecting China’s carbon intensity. 3. The dominant cause of carbon intensity varies by region. In particular, the dominant cause of carbon intensity in low- and medium-level regions is urbanization. However, the dominant cause of carbon intensity in high-level regions is coal consumption. 4. Based on these empirical findings, policy recommendations to reduce carbon intensity were proposed. In summary, the improvement of urbanization quality in both low- and medium-level regions is urgently needed. However, optimizing the energy structure is essential to carbon intensity reduction in high-level regions.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 27
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.1331-1341,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wu R.

• State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
• University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

autor

Dong J.

• Department of Economics and Management, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng 044000, China

autor

Zhou L.

• Faculty of Geomatics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
• Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

autor

Zhang L.

• 1 State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
• University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Bibliografia

• 1. SAUTER C., GRETHER J.M., MATHYS N.A. Geographical spread of global emissions: Within-country inequalities are large and increasing. Energy Policy, 89, 138, 2016.
• 2. World energy outlook 2016. International Energy Agency, 2016, Available online: http://www.iea.org (accessed on 15 March 2017).
• 3. DONG F., LONG R., LI Z., DAI Y. Analysis of carbon emission intensity, urbanization and energy mix: evidence from China. Natural Hazards, 82, 1375, 2016.
• 4. CHEN J., WU Y., WEN J., CHENG S., WANG J. Regional differences in China›s fossil energy consumption: an analysis for the period 1997-2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 578, 2017.
• 5. DU K., LIN B., XIE C. Exploring Change in China’s Carbon Intensity: A Decomposition Approach. Sustainability, 9, 296, 2017.
• 6. WANG S., FANG C., WANG Y. Spatiotemporal variations of energy-related CO₂ emissions in China and its influencing factors: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 505, 2016.
• 7. GUO F., ZHAO T., WANG Y., WANG Y. Estimating the abatement potential of provincial carbon intensity based on the environmental learning curve model in China. Natural Hazards, 84, 685, 2016.
• 8. ZHU Z.S., LIAO H., CAO H.S., WANG L., WEI Y.M., YAN J. The differences of carbon intensity reduction rate across 89 countries in recent three decades. Applied Energy, 113, 808, 2014.
• 9. WANG H., YANG Y., KELLER A.A., LI X., FENG S.J., DONG Y.N., LI F.T. Comparative analysis of energy intensity and carbon emissions in wastewater treatment in USA, Germany, China and South Africa. Applied Energy, 184 (12), 873, 2016.
• 10. DURO J.A. The international distribution of energy intensities: Some synthetic results. Energy Policy, 83, 257, 2015.
• 11. CHENG Y., WANG Z., YE X., WEI Y.D. Spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon intensity from energy consumption in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24, 631, 2014.
• 12. DURO J.A. On the automatic application of inequality indexes in the analysis of the international distribution of environmental indicators. Ecological Economics, 76, 1, 2012.
• 13. DURO J.A., ALCÁNTARA V., PADILLA E. International inequality in energy intensity levels and the role of production composition and energy efficiency: An analysis of OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 69, 2468, 2010.
• 14. DURO J.A. Intercountry inequality on greenhouse gas emissions and world levels: An integrated analysis through general distributive sustainability indexes. Ecological Indicators, 66, 173, 2016.
• 15. YUE C., HU X., CANFEI H., ZHU J., WANG, S., FANG J. Provincial Carbon Emissions and Carbon Intensity in China from 1995 to 2007 (Carbon Emissions and Social Development III). Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 46, 510, 2010 [In Chinese].
• 16. LI J., HUANG X., YANG H., CHUAI X., WU C. Convergence of carbon intensity in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Habitat International, 60, 58, 2017.
• 17. ZHAO X., WESLEY B.J., LACOMBE D.J. Province-level convergence of China’s carbon dioxide emissions. Applied Energy, 150, 286, 2015.
• 18. ZHANG D., BROADSTOCK D.C. Club Convergence in the Energy Intensity of China. Energy Journal, 37 (3), 137, 2016.
• 19. BURNETT J.W., MADARIAGA J. The convergence of U.S. state-level energy intensity, Energy Economics, 62 (2), 357, 2017.
• 20. HERRERIAS M.J., ALLER C., ORDÓÑEZ J. Residential energy consumption: A convergence analysis across Chinese regions. Energy Economics, 62 (2), 371, 2017.
• 21. HERRERIAS M.J. World energy intensity convergence revisited: A weighted distribution dynamics approach. Energy Policy, 49, 383, 2012.
• 22. ZHANG W., LI K., ZHOU D., ZHANG W., GAO H. Decomposition of intensity of energy-related CO₂ emission in Chinese provinces using the LMDI method. Energy Policy, 92, 369, 2016.
• 23. WANG J., ZHAO T., XU X., ZHANG X. Exploring the changes of energy-related carbon intensity in China: an extended Divisia index decomposition. Natural Hazards, 83, 501, 2016.
• 24. XIONG C.H., YANG D.G., HUO J.W., ZHAO Y.N. The relationship between agricultural carbon emissions and agricultural economic growth and policy recommendations of a low-carbon agriculture economy in Hotan Prefecture, China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 25 (5), 2187, 2016.
• 25. SUPASA T, HSIAU S.S., LIN S.M., WU. J.C. Has energy conservation been an effective policy for Thailand? An input-output structural decomposition analysis from 1995 to 2010. Energy Policy, 98, 210, 2016.
• 26. SU B., ANG B.W. Multiplicative decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity change using input–output analysis. Applied Energy, 154, 13, 2015.
• 27. XIE Y., WENG Q. World energy consumption pattern as revealed by DMSP-OLS nighttime light imagery, Giscience & Remote Sensing, 53 (2), 265, 2015.
• 28. WANG Z., ZHANG B., LIU T. Empirical analysis on the factors influencing national and regional carbon intensity in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 34, 2016.
• 29. ROBAINA A.M., MOUTINHO V. Decomposition analysis and Innovative Accounting Approach for energy-related CO₂ (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996–2009 in Portugal. Energy, 57, 775, 2013.
• 30. CHEN J., CHENG S., SONG M., WANG J. Interregional differences of coal carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy, 96, 1, 2016.
• 31. WANG Z., YANG L. Delinking indicators on regional industry development and carbon emissions: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economic band case. Ecological Indicators, 48, 41, 2015.
• 32. OU J., LIU X., LI X., CHEN Y. Quantifying the relationship between urban forms and carbon emissions using panel data analysis. Landscape ecology, 28, 1889, 2013.
• 33. YORK R., ROSA E.A., DIETZ T. Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American sociological review, 68 (2), 279, 2003.
• 34. ALPER A., ONUR G. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for sub-elements of the carbon emissions in China. Natural Hazards, 82 (2), 1327, 2016.
• 35. The National Bureau And Statistics of China. National Statistics Yearbook of China. China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1996-2015.
• 36. Ministry of Commerce of the People›s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook of Commerce. China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1996-2015.
• 37. KALANTARI M., YAGHMAEI B., GHEZELBASH S. Spatio-temporal analysis of crime by developing a method to detect critical distances for the Knox test, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (11), 2302, 2016.
• 38. LAKKA S., STAMATI T., MICHALAKELIS C., MARTAKOS D. What drives eGovernment growth? An econometric analysis on the impacting factors. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6, 20, 2013.
• 39. WOOLDRIDGE J.M. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, The MIT press: London, England, 2010.
• 40. PESARAN M.H. General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 7, 1240, 2004.
• 41. MARTORANO B., SANFILIPPO M. Structural Change and Wage Inequality in the Manufacturing Sector: Long Run Evidence from East Asia. Oxford Development Studies, 43 (2), 212, 2015.
• 42. The State Council of the People's Republic of China. National guidelines for developing a new type of urbanization, 2014. Available online: http://money.163. com/14/0317/08/9NHA7U7300253B0H.html (accessed on 22 March 2017)
• 43. LI Y., ZHAO R., LIU T., ZHAO J. Does urbanization lead to more direct and indirect household carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from China during 1996–2012. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 103, 2015.
• 44. ZHANG C., ZHOU X. Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO₂ emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 943, 2016.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/76364