Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 43 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

DNA barcoding of freshwater fishes from Lake Laut Tawar, Aceh Province, Indonesia

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji



Background. on a short standardized segment of the genome. The main objective of the barcode of life project is to provide a database of genetic sequences which can be used as a tool for universal species identification. Indonesia has at least 1300 freshwater fish species, however unfortunately no species has been barcoded as yet. In the presently reported study, we subjected to barcoding a total of 14 species of freshwater fishes from Lake Laut Tawar, Indonesia. Materials and Methods. On average, 10 random samples from each species were processed for DNA analysis. Approximately 655-bp were amplified from the 5′ region of the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COX1) gene. All obtained sequences were edited and aligned using MEGA 4.0 program. Nucleotide divergence among sequences was estimated based on Kimura 2-parameter distances. Unique haplotypes were determined using DnaSP Version 5.10.02 software, and the genetic relations among haplotypes were assessed by constructing a phenogram using the neighbour-joining method. Results. A total of 31 haplotypes from 14 freshwater fish species were produced in this study. The read lengths were 626-bp, where 259 sites were polymorphic, 254 sites parsimony informative, and five singletons. No stop codons, deletions, or insertions were observed in any of the sequences. The nucleotide distance between species ranged from 7.1%—between Puntius brevis (Bleeker, 1850) and Poropuntius tawarensis (Weber et de Beaufort, 1916)—to 30.4%—between Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822) and Homaloptera sp.—indicating that P. brevis and P. tawarensis are very closely related. Conclusion. >This study confirms the utility of COX1 gene in accurate identification of 14 species of freshwater fishes from Lake Laut Tawar, however, three species could not be identified to species level namely Rasbora sp. (local name: relo), Homaloptera sp. (ilie) and Clarias sp. (mud). It is suggested that future studies should incorporate morphometric methods to resolve the taxonomic status of these undetermined species

Słowa kluczowe








Opis fizyczny



  • Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Marine and Fishery Sciences, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Marine and Fishery Sciences, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Department of Educational Biology, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800. Malaysia


  • Anonymous 2011. Global invasive species database. [Accessem on 2 December 2011].
  • Boehme P., Amendt J., Disney R.H.L., Zehner R. 2010.Molecular identification of carrion-breeding scuttle flies (Diptera: Phoridae) using COI barcodes. International Journal of Legal Medicine 124 (6): 577–581. DOI:10.1007/s00414-010-0429-5
  • Chino N., Arai T. 2010. Migratory history of the giant mottled eel (Anguilla marmorata) in the Bonin Islands of Japan.Ecology of Freshwater Fish 19 (1): 19–25. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2009.00385.x
  • De Ley P., De Ley I.T., Morris K., Abebe E., Mundo-Ocampo M., Yoder M., Heras J., Waumann D., Rocha-Olivares A., Burr A.H.J., Baldwin J.G., Thomas W.K. 2005. An integrated approach to fast and informative morphological vouchering of nematodes for applications in molecular barcoding.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Part B: Biological Sciences 360 (1462): 1945–1958. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2005.1726
  • Fischer Z., Lyakhnovich V.P. 1973. Biology and bioenergetics of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.). Polish Archives of Hydrobiology 20: 521–557.
  • Floyd R., Abebe E., Papert A., Blaxter M. 2002. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Molecular Ecology 11 (4): 839–850. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01485.x
  • Hajibabaei M., deWaard J.R., Ivanova N.V., Ratnasingham S.,Dooh R.T., Kirk S.L., Mackie P.M., Hebert P.D.N. 2005.Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Part B:Biological Sciences 360 (1462): 1959–1967. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2005.1727
  • Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., deWaard J.R. 2003a.Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.Proceeding of Royal Society Part B: Biological Science 270 (1512): 313–322. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
  • Hebert P.D.N., Penton E.H., Burns J.M., Janzen D.H.,Hallwachs W. 2004a. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences USA 101 (41): 14812–14817. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0406166101
  • Hebert P. D. N., Ratnasingham S., de Waard J.R. 2003b.Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceeding of the Royal Society Part B: Biological Sciences 270 (Suppl. 1):S96–S99. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025
  • Hebert P.D.N., Stoeckle M.Y., Zemlak T.S., Francis C.M.2004b. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology 2 (10): 1657–1663. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312
  • Hogg I.D., Hebert P.D.N. 2004. Biological identification of springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) from the Canadian Arctic, using mitochondrial DNA barcodes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82 (5): 749–754. DOI: 10.1139/z04-041
  • Hubert N., Hanner R., Holm E., Mandrak N.E., Taylor E.,Burridge M., Watkinson D., Dumont P., Curry A., Benzen P., Zhang J., April J., Bernatchez L. 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PloS One 3 (6): 1–8. e2490. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002490
  • Jurado-Rivera J.A., Vogler A.P., Reid C.A.M., Petitpierre E.,Gómez-Zurita J. 2009. DNA barcoding insect–host plant associations. Proceedings of the Royal Society Part B:Biological Sciences 276 (1657): 639–648. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2008.1264
  • Kohlmann K., Kersten P., Flajšhans M. 2005. Microsatellitebased genetic variability and differentiation of domesticated,wild and feral common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) populations.Aquaculture 247 (1–4): 253–266. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.024
  • Kottelat M., Whitten A.J., Kartikasari S.N., Wirjoatmodjo S.1993. Freshwater fishes of western Indonesia and Sulawesi.Periplus Edition, Singapore.
  • Kottelat M., Whitten T. 1996. Freshwater biodiversity in Asia with special reference to fish. World Bank Technical Paper No. 343. World Bank, Washington DC. USA.
  • Lara A., Ponce deLeón J.L., Rodríguez R., Casane D., Côté G.,Bernatchez L., García-Machado E. 2009. DNA barcoding of Cuban freshwater fishes: evidence for cryptic species and taxonomic conflicts. Molecular Ecology Resources 10 (3): 421–430. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02785.x
  • Lefébure T., Douady C.J., Gouy M., Gibert J. 2006.Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: Proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40 (2): 435–447. DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.014
  • Leuzzi M.S.P., de Almeida F.S., Orsi L.M.K. 2004. Analysis by RAPD of the genetic structure of Astyanax altiparanae (Pisces, Characiformes) in reservoirs on the Paranapanema River, Brazil. Genetic and Molecular Biology 27 (3):355–362. DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572004000300009
  • Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S., De Poorter M. 2000. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species a selection from the global invasive species database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Matoso D.A., Artoni R.F., Galetti P.M.jr. 2004. Genetic diversity of the small characid fish Astyanax sp., and its significant for conservation. Hydrobiologia 527 (1): 223–225.DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000043303.02986.71
  • McDowall R.M. 1988. Diadromy in fishes. Croom Helm,London, UK.
  • Mejía O., León-Romero Y., Soto-Galera E. 2012. DNA barcoding of the ichthyofauna of P疣uco-Tames complex: Evidence for taxonomic conflicts in some groups.Mitochondrial DNA 23 (6): 471–476. DOI:10.3109/19401736.2012.710207
  • Memiş D., Kohlmann K. 2006. Genetic characterization of wild common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) from Turkey.Aquaculture 258 (1–4): 257–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.041
  • Muchlisin Z.A., Fadli N., Siti-Azizah M.N. 2012. Genetic variation and taxonomy of Rasbora group (Cyprinidae) from Lake Laut Tawar, Indonesia. Journal of Ichthyology 52 (4): 284–290. DOI: 10.1134/S0032945212030034
  • Muchlisin Z.A., Musman M., Siti-Azizah M.N. 2010.Length–weight relationships and condition factors of two threatened fishes, Rasbora tawarensis and Poropuntius tawarensis, endemic to Lake Laut Tawar, Aceh Province,Indonesia. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 26 (6): 949–953.DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01524.x
  • Muchlisin Z.A., Siti-Azizah M.N. 2009. Diversity and distribution of freshwater fishes in Aceh water, Northern-Sumatra,Indonesia. International Journal of Zoological Research 5 (2): 62–79. DOI: 10.3923/ijzr.2009.62.79
  • Murakaeva A., Kohlmann K., Kersten P., Kamilov B.,Khabibullin D. 2003. Genetic characterization of wild and domesticated common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) populations from Uzbekistan. Aquaculture 218 (1–4): 153–166.DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00005-X
  • Persis M., Reddy A.C.S., Rao L.M., Khedkar G.D., Ravinder K., Nasruddin K. 2009. COI (cytochrome oxidase-I)sequence based studies of carangid fishes from Żakinada coast, India. Molecular Biology Reports 36 (7): 1733–1740.DOI: 10.1007/s11033-008-9375-4
  • Pípalová I. 2006. A review of grass carp use for aquatic weed control and its impact on water bodies. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 44 (1): 1-12.
  • Ratnasingham S., Hebert P.D.N. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System ( Molecular Ecology Notes 7 (3): 355–364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x
  • Rozas J., Sánchez -DelBarrio J.C., Messeguer X., Rozas R.2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19 (18): 2496–2497.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359
  • Salini J.P., Overden J.R., Street R., Pendrey R., Haryanti,Ngurah 2006. Genetic population structure of red snappers (Lutjanus malabaricus Bloch & Schneider, 1801 and Lutjanus erythropterus Bloch, 1790) in central and ekstern Indonesia and northern Australia. Journal of Fish Biology 68 (SB): 217–234. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.001060.x
  • Smith M.A., Fisher B.L., Hebert P.D.N. 2005. DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Part B: Biological Sciences 360 (1462): 1825–1834. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2005.1714
  • Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4:Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24 (8):1596–1599. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm092
  • Tautz D., Arctander P., Minelli A., Thomas R.H., Vogler A.P.2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 (2): 70–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1
  • Valdez-Moreno M., Ivanova N.V., Elías-Gutiérrez M.,Contreras-Balderas S., Hebert P.D.N. 2009. Probing diversity in freshwater fishes from Mexico and Gwatemala with DNA barcodes. Journal of Fish Biology 74 (2):377–402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02077.x
  • Van Zon J.C.J. 1977. Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellaVal.) in Europe. Aquatic Botany 3: 143–155. DOI:10.1016/0304-3770(77)90014-6
  • Vences M., Thomas M., Bonett R.M., Vieites D.R. 2005.Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding:chances and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Part B: Biological Sciences 360 (1462):1859–1868. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1717
  • Ward B.R. 2000. Declivity in steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)recruitment at the Keogh River over the past decade.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57 (2):298–306. DOI: 10.1139/f99-243
  • Ward R.D., Hanner R., Hebert P.D.N. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. Journal of Fish Biology 74 (2): 329–356. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02080.x
  • Ward R.D., Zemlak T.S., Innes B.H., Last P.R., Hebert P.D.N.2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Part B: Biological Sciences 360 (1462): 1847–1857. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
  • Whitworth T.L., Dawson R.D., Magalon H., Baudry E. 2007.DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae).Proceedings of the Royal Society Part B: Biological Sciences 274 (1619): 1731–1739. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2007.0062


rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu



Identyfikator YADDA

JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.