PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2019 | 72 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

The effect of three soil tillage treatments on weed infestation in forage maize

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

PL
Wpływ trzech systemów uprawy gleby na występowanie zachwaszczenia w uprawie kukurydzy pastewnej

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
This study assessed the impact of using soil tillage in maize crops on weed infestation intensity and weed species composition. A field experiment was established as a model example of livestock production management in drier climate conditions where maize was grown in seven-step crop rotation sequence: alfalfa – the first year, alfalfa – the second year, winter wheat, forage maize, winter wheat, sugar beet, and spring barley. Three soil tillage treatments were applied: conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), and no-tillage (NT). An arithmetic method and multivariate analyses of ecological data were used. The highest weed infestation, mainly due to late spring species, was recorded in MT. Perennial and overwintering species were frequently observed in NT. Early spring weed species were abundant in CT. Different tillage treatments cause a significant change in the weed species spectrum in maize. A study of the relationship between tillage and the level of weed infestation requires long-term monitoring which will allow us to predict the intensity of weed infestation in particular locations.
PL
W badaniach określano wpływ systemu uprawy gleby w uprawie kukurydzy pastewnej na za-chwaszczenie i skład gatunkowy chwastów. Doświadczenie polowe zostało założone jako wzorcowe dla gospodarstwa specjalizującego się w produkcji zwierzęcej w strefie klimatu suchego, gdzie kukurydza była uprawiana w 7-letnim płodozmianie, który obejmował w pierwszym i drugim roku lucernę, a następnie pszenicę ozimą, kukurydzę pastewną, pszenicę ozimą, buraki i jęczmień jary. Zastosowano trzy systemy uprawy gleby: uprawę tradycyjną (CT), uproszczoną (MT) i bezorkową (NT). Zachwaszczenie określano stosując analizę danych ekologicznych oraz analizy wielowymiarowe. Największe zachwaszczenie (głównie w odniesieniu do gatunków chwastów późno wiosennych) zanotowano, gdy kukurydza uprawiana była w systemie uproszczonym. Gatunki wieloletnie i zimujące były często obserwowane w NT. Gatunki chwastów wczesnowiosennych licznie występowały w CT. Różne systemy uprawy istotnie wpływają na kompozycję gatunkowej chwastów w uprawie kukurydzy. Określenie relacji pomiędzy systemami uprawy a poziomem zachwaszczenia wymaga prowadzenia długoterminowego monitoringu, który pozwoli na prze-widywanie intensywności zachwaszczenia w poszczególnych lokalizacjach.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

72

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

Article: 1756 [8 p.], fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Faculty of Agri Sciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1/1665, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
autor
  • Faculty of Agri Sciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1/1665, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
autor
  • Faculty of Agri Sciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1/1665, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

  • Tatsumi K, Yamashiki Y, da Silva RV, Takara K, Matsuoka Y, Takahashi K, et al. Estimation of potential changes in cereals production under climate change scenarios. Hydrol Process. 2011;25(17):2715–2725. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8012
  • Whalen JK, Sampedro L. Soil ecology and management. Wallingford: CABI Publishers; 2010.
  • Andr J, Hejnák V, Jursík M, Fendrychová V. Effects of application terms of three soil active herbicides on herbicide efficacy and reproductive ability for weeds in maize. Plant Soil Environ. 2014;60(10):452–458. https://doi.org/10.17221/561/2014-PSE
  • Bhatt MD, Tewari A. Losses in growth and yield attributes due to weed composition in transplanted paddy in Terai region. Scientific World. 2006;4(4):99–101.
  • Kostov T, Pacanoski Z. Weeds with major economic impact on agriculture in Republic of Macedonia. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 2007;13(3–4):227–239.
  • Baessler C, Klotz S. Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2006;115(1–4):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.12.007
  • Holub J, Procházka F. Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia. 2000;72:187–230.
  • Cavers PB. Seed banks: memory in soil. Can J Soil Sci. 1995;75(1):11–13. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss95-003
  • Conn JS. Weed seed bank affected by tillage intensity for barley in Alaska. Soil Tillage Res. 2006;90:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.08.014
  • Derpsch R, Friedrich T, Kassam A, Hongwen L. Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2010;3(1):1–25.
  • Chauhan BS, Gill GS, Preston C. Tillage system effects on weed ecology, herbicide activity and persistence: a review. Aust J Exp Agric. 2006;46(12):1557–1570. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05291
  • Liebman M, Mohler CHL, Staver CHP. Ecological management of agricultural weeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541810
  • Jurado-Expósito M, López-Granados F, González-Andújar JL, García-Torres L. Spatial and temporal analysis of Convolvulus arvensis L. populations over four growing seasons. Eur J Agron. 2004;21(3):287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2003.10.001
  • Mayor JP, Maillard A. Results from an over-20-years-old ploughless tillage experiment at Changins. Revue Suisse d’Agriculture, 1995;27(4):229–236.
  • Graglia E, Melander B, Jensen RK. Mechanical and cultural strategies to control Cirsium arvense in organic arable cropping systems. Weed Res. 2006;46(4):304–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00514.x
  • Buhler DD. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage system. Weed Sci. 1992;40(2):241–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500057295
  • Barberi P, Cozzani A, Macchia M, Bonari E. Size and composition of the weed seedbank under different management systems for continuous maize cropping. Weed Res. 1998;38(5):319–334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.1998.00098.x
  • Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Ecological studies on Echinochloa crus-galli and the implications for weed management in direct-seeded rice. Crop Prot. 2011;30(11):1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.07.013
  • Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek J, Kaplan Z, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J. Key to the flora of the Czech Republic. Prague: Academia; 2002.
  • Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to CANOCO for Windows: software for canonical community ordination. New York, NY: Microcomputer Power; 1998.
  • Vasileiadis VP, Froud-Williams RJ, Loddo D, Eleftherohorinos IG. Emergence dynamics of barnyardgrass and jimsonweed from two depths when switching from conventional to reduced and no-till conditions. Span J Agric Res. 2016;14(1):e1002. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016141-8752
  • Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Ecological studies on Echinochloa crus-galli and the implications for weed management in direct-seeded rice. Crop Prot. 2011;30:1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.07.013
  • Talbert RE, Burgos NR. History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol. 2007;21(2):324–331. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-084.1
  • Chauhan BS. Shade reduces growth and seed production of Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crus-galli and Echinochloa glabrescens. Crop Prot. 2013;43:241–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.009
  • Crabtree GD, Westwood MN. Effects of weed control method and rootstock on flowering, growth and yield of apple. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1976;101(4):454–456.
  • Rusu T, Gus P, Bogdan I. The influence of minimum soil tillage systems on weed density, frequency of phytopatogenous agents and crop yields of soybean, wheat, potato, rape and corn. J Food Agric Environ. 2006;4(1):225–227.
  • Kobayashi H, Nakamura Y, Watanabe Y. Analysis of weed vegetation of no-tillage upland fields based on the multiplied dominance ratio. Weed Biol Manag. 2003;3(2):77–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2003.00088.x
  • Demjanova E, Macak M, Dalovic I, Majernik F, Stefan T, Jozef S. Effects of tillage systems and crop rotation on weed density, weed species composition and weed biomass in maize. Agronomy Research. 2009;7(2):785–792.
  • Jurado-Expósito M, López-Granados F, González-Andújar JL, García-Torres L. Spatial and temporal analysis of Convolvulus arvensis L. populations over four growing seasons. Eur J Agron. 2004;21:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2003.10.001
  • Cimalová Š, Lososová Z. Arable weed vegetation of the northeastern part of the Czech Republic: effects of environmental factors on species composition. Plant Ecol. 2009;203(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9503-1
  • Nakamoto T, Yamagishi J, Miura F. Effect of reduced tillage on weeds and soil organisms in winter wheat and summer maize cropping on humic andosols in central Japan. Soil Tillage Res. 2006;85(1–2):94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.12.004
  • Ali S, Malik MA, Ansar M, Qureshi R. Weed growth dynamics associated with rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) establishment under different tillage systems in pothwar. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences. 2014;4(2):146–154.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-0d6b066e-4528-4303-b49b-81539f1351bc
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.