Changes in the building structure of Choroszcz and Narew districts over the years 1931–1998

• Autorzy: Prochnicki P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

building structure; change; urbanization process; settlement; Choroszcz town; Narew commune; demographic development; economic development; natural environment; suburban zone; spatial statistics; 1931-1998 period

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Environmental Development
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 14
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume14/issue3/art-01.html

Twórcy

autor

Prochnicki P.

• Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45a, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Andersen M.; 1992. Spatial analysis of two species interactions. Oecologia; 91; 134-140.
• 2. Baker L.A., Hope D., Xu Y., Edmonds J. and Lauver L. 2001.; Nitrogen Balance for the Central Arizona-Phoenix (CAP) Ecosystem. Ecosystems; 4; 582-602.
• 3. Barot S., Gignoux J., Menaut J.C. 1999.; Demography of savanna palm tree: predictions from comprehensive spatial pattern analysis. Ecology; 80; 1987-2005.
• 4. Breuste J., Feldmann H. and Uhlmann O. 1998.; Urban Ecology; Berlin; Springer.
• 5. Clifford P., Richardson S., Hémon D. 1989.; Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics; 45; 123-134.
• 6. Dale M.R.T. 1999.; Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
• 7. Dixon P.M. 2002.; Nearest-neighbor contingency table analysis of spatial segregation for several species. Ecoscience; 9; 142-142.
• 8. Dutilleul P. 1993.; Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics; 49; 305-314.
• 9. Dutilleul P., Stockwell J.D., Frigon D., Legendre P.. 2000.; The Mantel test versus Pearson's correlation analysis: Assessment of the differences for biological and environmental studies. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics; 5; 131-150.
• 10. Forman R. 1995.; Land mosaics, the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
• 11. Fortin M.-J., Dale M.R.T. 2005.; Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
• 12. Haase P. 1995.; Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: introduction and methods of edge correction. Journal of Vegetation Science; 6; 575-582.
• 13. Legendre P., Fortin M.-J. 1989.; Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio; 80; 107-138.
• 14. Łomnicki A. 2000., Wprowadzenie do statystyki dla przyrodników. [Introduction to statistic for environmentalist]. Warszawa; PWN. [in Polish]
• 15. Luck M., Wu J. 2002.; A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology; 17; 327-339.
• 16. McDonnell M.J., Pickett S., Groffman P. and Bohlen P. 1997.; Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosys.; 1; 21-36.
• 17. Rangel T.F., Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Bini L.M. 2010.; SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology (Version 4). Ecography; 33; 46-50.
• 18. Ripley B.D. 1976.; The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability; 13; 255-266.
• 19. Rosenberg M.S., Anderson C.D. (in press) 2011.; PASSaGE: Pattern Analysis, Spatial Statistics and Geographic Exegesis Version 2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2.
• 20. Solon J. 2009.; Spatial context of urbanization: Landscape pattern and changes between 1950 and 1990 in the Warsaw metropolitan area, Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning; 93; 250-261.
• 21. Sukopp H. 1998. Urban ecology-Scientific and practical aspects. Breuste J. (ed)., Urban Ecology; Berlin; Springer; 3-16.