Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 56 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Analyses of least cost paths for determining effects of habitat types on landscape permeability: wolves in Poland

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Determining ecological corridors is crucial for conservation efforts in fragmented habitats. Commonly employed least cost path (LCP) analysis relies on the underlying cost matrix. By using Ecological Niche Factor Analysis, we minimized the problems connected with subjective cost assessment or the use of presence/absence data. We used data on the wolf presence/absence in Poland to identify LCPs connecting patches of suitable wolf habitat, factors that influence patch occupancy, and compare LCPs between different genetic subpopulations. We found that a lower proportion of cities and roads surrounds the most densely populated patches. Least cost paths between areas where little dispersal takes place (i.e., leading to unpopulated patches or between different genetic subpopulations) ran through a higher proportion of roads and human settlements. They also crossed larger maximal distances over deforested areas. We propose that, apart from supplying the basis for direct conservation efforts, LCPs can be used to determine what factors might facilitate or hinder dispersal by comparing different subsets of LCPs. The methods employed can be widely applicable to gain more in-depth information on potential dispersal barriers for large carnivores.
Opis fizyczny
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, 3260 South Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
  • Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Waszkiewicza 1, 17-230 Białowieza, Poland
  • Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Waszkiewicza 1, 17-230 Bialowieza, Poland
  • Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Waszkiewicza 1, 17-230 Bialowieza, Poland
  • Association for Nature “Wolf”, Twardorzeczka 229, 34-229 Lipowa, Poland
  • Association for Nature “Wolf”, Twardorzeczka 229, 34-229 Lipowa, Poland
  • Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of least-cost modelling as a functional landscape model. Land Urban Plan 64:233–247. doi:10.​1016/​S0169-2046(02)00242-6
  • Anderson GS, Danielson BJ (1997) The effects of landscape composition and physiognomy on metapopulation size: The role of corridors. Landscape Ecol 12:261–271. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1007933623979
  • Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:281–300. doi:10.​1016/​S0304-3800(02)00200-4
  • Braunisch V, Bollmann K, Graf RF, Hirzel AH (2008) Living on the edge—modelling habitat suitability for species at the edge of their fundamental niche. Ecol Model 214:153–167. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolmodel.​2008.​02.​001
  • Bryan TL, Metaxas A (2007) Predicting suitable habitat for deep-water gorgonian corals on the Atlantic and Pacific continental margins of North America. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 330:113–126. doi:10.​3354/​meps330113
  • Ciucci P, Masi M, Boitani L (2003) Winter habitat and travel route selection by wolves in the Northern Apennines, Italy. Ecography 26(2):223–235. doi:10.​1034/​j.​1600-0587.​2003.​03353.​x
  • Clevenger AP, Waltho N (2000) Factors influencing the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National park, Alberta, Canada. Conserv Biol 14:47–56. doi:10.​1046/​j.​1523-1739.​2000.​00099-085.​x
  • Coulon A, Cosson J, Angibault J, Cargnelutti B, Galan M, Morellet N, Petit E, Aulagnier S, Hewison AJM (2004) Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol Ecol 13:2841–2850. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-294X.​2004.​02253.​x
  • Coulon A, Morellet N, Goulard M, Cargnelutti B, Angibault J-M, Hewison AJM (2008) Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function. Landscape Ecol 23:603–614. doi:10.​1007/​s10980-008-9220-0
  • Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2008) Accessible habitat: an improved measure of the effects of habitat loss and roads on wildlife populations. Landscape Ecol 23:159–168. doi:10.​1007/​s10980-007-9174-7
  • Epps CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS (2007) Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. J Appl Ecol 44(4):714–724. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2664.​2007.​01325.​x
  • Fortin D, Beyer HL, Boyce MS, Smith DW, Duchesnde T, Mao JS (2005) Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86(5):1320–1330. doi:10.​1890/​04-0953
  • Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N (2002a) Biomapper 4.0. Lab. for Conservation Biology, Lausanne
  • Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N (2002b) Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology 83(7):2027–2036. doi:10.​1890/​0012-9658(2002)083[2027:​ENFAHT]2.​0.​CO;2
  • Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol Model 199:142–152. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolmodel.​2006.​05.​017
  • Huck M, Jędrzejewski W, Borowik T, Miłosz-Cielma M, Schmidt K, Jędrzejewska B, Nowak S, Mysłajek RW (2010) Habitat suitability, corridors and dispersal barriers for large carnivores in Poland. Acta Theriol 55(2):177–192. doi:10.​4098/​j.​at.​0001-7051.​114.​2009
  • Jędrzejewski W, Niedziałkowska M, Nowak S, Jędrzejewska B (2004) Habitat variables associated with wolf (Canis lupus) distribution and abundance in northern Poland. Divers Distrib 10:225–233. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1366-9516.​2004.​00073.​x
  • Jędrzejewski W, Niedziałkowska M, Mysłajek RW, Nowak S, Jędrzejewska B (2005) Habitat selection by wolves Canis lupus in the uplands and mountains of southern Poland. Acta Theriol 50(3):417–428
  • Jędrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Jędrzejewska B, Kowalczyk R (2007) Territory size of wolves Canis lupus: linking local (Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland) and Holarctic-scale patterns. Ecography 30:66–76. doi:10.​1111/​j.​0906-7590.​2007.​04826.​x
  • Jędrzejewski W, Jędrzejewska B, Zawadzka B, Borowik T, Nowak S, Mysłajek RW (2008) Habitat suitability model for polish wolves based on long-term national census. Anim Conserv 11(5):377–390. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1469-1795.​2008.​00193.​x
  • Jędrzejewski W, Nowak S, Kurek R, Mysłajek RW, Stachura K, Zawadzka B, Pchałek M (2009) Animals and roads—methods of mitigating the negative impact of roads on wildlife. Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża
  • Jenness J (2004) Alternate animal movement routes (altroutes.Avx) extension for Arcview 3.X, v. 2.1. Jenness enterprises
  • Klar N, Fernández N, Kramer-Schadt S, Herrmann M, Trinzen M, Büttner I, Niemitz C (2008) Habitat selection models for European wildcat conservation. Biol Conserv 141(1):308–319. doi:10.​1016/​j.​biocon.​2007.​10.​004
  • Kusak J, Huber D, Gomerčić T, Schwaderer G, Gužvica G (2009) The permeability of highway in Gorski Kotar (Croatia) for large mammals. Eur J Wildl Res 55:7–21. doi:10.​1007/​s10344-008-0208-5
  • Lovari S, Sforzi A, Scala C, Fico R (2007) Mortality parameters of the wolf in Italy: does the wolf keep himself from the door? J Zool Lond 272:117–124. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1469-7998.​2006.​00260.​x
  • MacArthur RH (1957) On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 43(3):293–295. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​43.​3.​293
  • Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) (2003) Wolves—behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago, Chicago
  • Meriggi A, Rosa P, Brangi A, Matteucci C (1991) Habitat use and diet of the wolf in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 6(1–2):141–151
  • Miller CJ, Genovese C, Nichol RC, Wasserman L, Connolly A, Reichart D, Hopkins A, Schneider J, Moore A (2001) Controlling the false-discovery rate in astrophysical data analysis. Astron J 122:3492–3505. doi:10.​1086/​324109
  • Noss RF, Quigley HB, Hornocker MG, Merrill T, Paquet PC (1996) Conservation biology and carnivore conservation in the Rocky Mountains. Conserv Biol 10(4):949–963. doi:10.​1046/​j.​1523-1739.​1996.​10040949.​x
  • Oviedo L, Solís M (2008) Underwater topography determines critical breeding habitat for humpback whales near Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica: implications for marine protected areas. Rev Biol Trop 56(2):591–602
  • Palomares F, Delibes M, Ferreras P, Fedriani JM, Calzada J, Revilla E (2000) Iberian lynx in a fragmented landscape: predispersal, dispersal, and postdispersal habitats. Conserv Biol 14(3):809–818. doi:10.​1046/​j.​1523-1739.​2000.​98539.​x
  • Pearce JL, Boyce MS (2006) Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. J Appl Ecol 43:405–412. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2664.​2005.​01112.​x
  • Pilot M, Jędrzejewski W, Branicki W, Sidorovich VE, Jędrzejewska B, Stachura K, Funk S (2006) Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Mol Ecol 15:4533–4553. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-294X.​2006.​03110.​x
  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://​www.​R-project.​org.
  • Ray N (2005) Pathmatrix: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples. Mol Ecol Notes 5:177–180. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1471-8286.​2004.​00843.​x
  • Ray N, Burgman MA (2006) Subjective uncertainties in habitat suitability maps. Ecol Model 195:172–186. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolmodel.​2005.​11.​039
  • Salvatori V, Linnell J (2005) Report on the conservation status and threats for wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Strasbourg. http://​www.​lcie.​org/​Docs/​COE/​Salvatori%20​COE%20​Status%20​of%20​the%20​wolf%20​in%20​Europe.​pdf
  • Schadt S, Knauer F, Kaczensky P, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Trepl L (2002) Rule-based assessment of suitable habitat and patch connectivity for the Eurasian lynx in Germany. Ecol Appl 12:1469–1483. doi:10.​1890/​1051-0761(2002)012[1469:​RBAOSH]2.​0.​CO;2
  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Gray M (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68(3):571–573. doi:10.​2307/​3544927
  • Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14(1):18–30. doi:10.​1046/​j.​1523-1739.​2000.​99084.​x
  • Wang M, Schreiber A (2001) The impact of habitat fragmentation and social structure on the population genetics of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus l.) in central Europe. Heredity 86:703–715. doi:10.​1046/​j.​1365-2540.​2001.​00889.​x
  • Wang Y-H, Yang K-C, Bridgman CL, Lin L-K (2008) Habitat suitability modelling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecol 23:989–1000. doi:10.​1007/​s10980-008-9262-3
  • Zimmermann F, Breitenmoser U (2007) Potential distribution and population size of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in the Jura Mountains and possible corridors to adjacent ranges. Wildl Biol 13(4):406–416. doi:10.​2981/​0909-6396(2007)13[406:​PDAPSO]2.​0.​CO;2
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.