A PSBM model for environmental efficiency evaluation and its application

• Autorzy: Song M. , Peng J. , Liu W. , An Q.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The traditional efficiency evaluation model considering undesirable outputs is only able to calculate the efficiency of the overall value of the decision-making units. This paper puts forward a new environmental efficiency evaluation based on the proper slack-based measurement (PSBM) model, which can give the efficiency values of the inputs, desirable outputs, and undesirable outputs. The results from the new model are not only highly correlated with SBM-based evaluation results, but also coincide with reality, which can be used to test the effectiveness of the new model. Our model provides more information for environmental efficiency evaluation analysis.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

proper slack-based measurement model; environmental efficiency; application; efficiency value; environment protection; valuation analysis

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.893-900,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Song M.

• School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 233030 Bengbu, China

autor

Peng J.

• School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 233030 Bengbu, China

autor

Liu W.

• Business School, East China University of Political Science and Law, 200042 Shanghai, China

autor

An Q.

• School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China

Bibliografia

• 1. SALA-GARRIDO R., HERNÁNDEZ-SANCHO F., MOLINOS-SENANTE M. Assessing the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in an uncertain context: a DEA with tolerances. Environ. Sci. Policy. 18, 34, 2012.
• 2. SONG M.L., AN Q.X., ZHANG W., WANG Z.Y., WU J. Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 16, (7), 4465, 2012.
• 3. CHARNES A., COOPER W.W., RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2, (6), 429, 1978.
• 4. KHODABAKHSHI M. Super-efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis: An input relaxation approach. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235, (16), 4576, 2011.
• 5. BANKER R.D., CHARNES A., COOPER W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30, (9), 1080, 1984.
• 6. CHARNES A., COOPER W.W., GOLANY B., SEIFORD L., STUTZ J. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econometrics. 30, (1-2), 91, 1985.
• 7. LIU W., MENG B.W., LI X.X., ZHANG D.Q. DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Ann. Oper. Res. 173, (1), 177, 2010.
• 8. FÄRE R., GROSSKOPF S., LOVELL C.A.K. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 71, (1), 90, 1989.
• 9. LIU W.B., SHARP J. DEA models via goal programming. In G.Westerman (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis in the public and private sector. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag, 1999.
• 10. HAILU A., VEEMAN T. Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to Canadian pulp and paper industry. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 83, 3, 605, 2001.
• 11. GOLANY, B., ROLL, Y. An application procedure for DEA. Omega: Int. J. Manage. S., 17, 237, 1989.
• 12. LOVELL, C. A. K., PASTOR, J. T., TURNER, J. A. Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of European and non-European countries. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 87, 507, 1995.
• 13. SONG M.L., WU J., YANG L., CAO X.F., LIANG L. Undesirable outputs,shadow prices and improvement on inefficient decision making units. J. Manage. Sci. China. 15, (10), 1-10, 2012 [In Chinese].
• 14. SEIFORD L.M., ZHU J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142, 1, 16, 2002.
• 15. FÄRE R., GROSSKOPF S. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 157, (1), 242, 2004.
• 16. WANG Q.W., ZHOU D.Q., GE S.L., ZHOU P. Research on Input-output Efficiency and Regulatory Cost Under Environmental Regulation. J. Manage. Sci. 22, (6), 111, 2009 [In Chinese].
• 17. JIANG Z.G., ZHANG H., YAN W., ZHOU M., LI G.F., HUANG G.. Integrated Environmental Performance Assessment of Basic Oxygen Furnace Steelmaking. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21, (5), 1237, 2012.
• 18. TONE K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, (3), 498, 2001.
• 19. WEI C., NI J.L., SHENG M.H. China's energy inefficiency: A cross-country comparison. Soc. Sci. J. 48, (3), 478, 2011.
• 20. ZHANG N., CHOI Y. Environmental energy efficiency of China's regional economies: A non-oriented slacks-based measure analysis. Soc. Sci. J. j.soscij.2013.01.003, 2013.
• 21. ŠAUER P., KREUZ J., HADRABOVÁ A., DVOŘÁK A. Assessment of Environmental Policy Implementation: Two Case Studies from the Czech Republic. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21, (5), 1383, 2012.