Drive counts as a method of estimating ungulate density in forests: mission impossible?

• Autorzy: Borkowski J. , Palmer S. C. F. , Borowski Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Although drive counts are frequently used to estimate the size of deer populations in forests, little is known about how counting methods or the density and social organization of the deer species concerned influence the accuracy of the estimates obtained, and hence their suitability for informing management decisions. As these issues cannot readily be examined for real populations, we conducted a series of ‘virtual experiments’ in a computer simulation model to evaluate the effects of block size, proportion of forest counted, deer density, social aggregation and spatial auto-correlation on the accuracy of drive counts. Simulated populations of red and roe deer were generated on the basis of drive count data obtained from Polish commercial forests. For both deer species, count accuracy increased with increasing density, and decreased as the degree of aggregation, either demographic or spatial, within the population increased. However, the effect of density on accuracy was substantially greater than the effect of aggregation. Although improvements in accuracy could be made by reducing the size of counting blocks for low-density, aggregated populations, these were limited. Increasing the proportion of the forest counted led to greater improvements in accuracy, but the gains were limited compared with the increase in effort required. If it is necessary to estimate the deer population with a high degree of accuracy (e.g. within 10% of the true value), drive counts are likely to be inadequate whatever the deer density. However, if a lower level of accuracy (within 20% or more) is acceptable, our study suggests that at higher deer densities (more than ca. five to seven deer/100 ha) drive counts can provide reliable information on population size.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 56
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.239-253,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Borkowski J.

• Department of Forest Ecology, Forest Research Institute, Braci Lesnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland

autor

Palmer S. C. F.

• Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, U.K.

autor

Borowski Z.

• Department of Forest Ecology, Forest Research Institute, Braci Lesnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• Andersen J (1953) Analysis of a Danish roe deer population (Capreolus capreolus) based on the extermination of the total stock. Dan Rev Game Biol 2:127–155
• Borkowski J (2001) Flight behavior and observability in human-disturbed sika deer. Acta Theriol 46:195–208
• Borkowski J (2004) Distribution and habitat use by red and roe deer following a large forest fire in South-western Poland. For Ecol Manage 201:287–293
• Borkowski J, Furubayashi K (1998) Seasonal and diel variation in group size among Japanese sika deer in different habitats. J Zool Lond 245:29–34
• Borkowski J, Ukalska J (2008) Winter habitat use by red deer in pine-dominated forest. For Ecol Manage 255:468–475
• Carranza J, Hedalgo de Trucios SJ, Medina R, Valencia J, Delgado J (1991) Space use by red deer in a Mediterranean ecosystem as determined by radio-tracking. Appl Anim Behav Sci 30:363–371
• Cederlund G, Bergqvist J, Kjellander P, Gill R, Gaillard JM, Boisaubert B, Ballon P, Duncan P (1998) Managing roe deer and their impact on the environment: maximising the net benefits to society. In: Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 337–372
• Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–378
• Daniels MJ (2006) Estimating red deer Cervus elaphus populations: an analysis of variation and cost-effectiveness of counting methods. Mamm Rev 36:235–247
• de Boer HY, van Breukelen L, Hootsmans MJM, van Wieren SE (2004) Flight distance in roe deer Capreolus capreolus and fallow deer Dama dama as related to hunting and other factors. Wildl Biol 10:35–41
• Dzięciołowski R (1979) Structure and spatial organization of deer populations. Acta Theriol 24:3–21
• Dzięciołowski R, Goszczyński J, Wasilewski M, Babińska-Werka J (1995) Numbers of red deer in the Słowiński National Park, Poland. Acta Theriol 40:45–51
• Gill RMA, Thomas ML, Stocker D (1997) The use of portable thermal imaging for estimating deer populations density in forest habitats. J Appl Ecol 34:1273–1286
• Green DG, Sadedin S (2005) Interactions matter—complexity in landscapes and ecosystems. Ecol Complex 2:117–130
• Grimm V, Wyszomirski T, Aikman D, Uchmański J (1999) Individual-based modelling and ecological theory: synthesis of a workshop. Ecol Modell 115:275–282
• Harris CM, Travis JMJ, Harwood J (2008) Evaluating the influence of epidemiological parameters and host ecology on the spread of phocine distemper virus through populations of harbour seals. PLoS ONE 3:e2710. doi:2710.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0002710
• Hewison MAJ, Vincent JP, Reby D (1998) Social organisation of European roe deer. In: Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 189–219
• Hirzel AH, Helfer V, Metral F (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol Modell 145:111–121
• Hosely NW (1956) Management of the white-tailed deer in its environment. In: Taylor WP (ed) The deer of North America. Stackpole Co, Harrisburg, pp 187–259
• Jędrzejewska B, Okarma H, Jędrzejewski W, Miłkowski L (1994) Effects of exploitation and protection on forest structure, ungulate density and wolf predation in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. J Appl Ecol 31:664–676
• Koster SH, Hart JA (1988) Methods of estimating ungulate populations in tropical forests. Afr J Ecol 26:117–126
• Lancia RA, Nichols JD, Pollock KH (1996) Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. In: Bookhout TA (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats, Fifthth edn. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 215–253
• Latham J, Staines BW, Gorman ML (1996) The relative densities of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer and their relationship in Scottish plantation forests. J Zool Lond 240:285–299
• Leopold A, Taylor WP, Bennett R, Chapman HH (1938) Wildlife research: is a practical and necessary basis for management? Trans N Am Wildl Conf 3:42–55
• Lowe VPW (1969) Population dynamics of red deer (Cervus elaphus, L.) on Rhum. J Anim Ecol 38:425–457
• McCullough DR (1979) The George reserve deer herd: population ecology of K-selected species. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 1–271
• Nasiadka P (1994) Metody i techniki inwentaryzacji zwierząt łownych. Biblioteczka Leśniczego 38:1–25
• Noss AJ, Leny Cuéllar Salidas R, Ayala Crespo J (2006) Drive counts for grey brocket deer Mazama gouazoupira in the Bolivian Chaco. Mammalia 70:64–69
• Overton WS (1969) Estimating the numbers of animals in wildlife populations. In: Giles RH Jr (ed) Wildlife management techniques manual, Thirdth edn. The Wildlife Society, Washington, pp 403–455
• Palmer SCF, Truscott AM (2003) Seasonal habitat use and browsing by deer in Caledonian pinewoods. For Ecol Manage 174:149–166
• Pielowski Z, Bresiński W (1982) Population characteristics of roe deer inhabiting a small forest. Acta Theriol 27:409–425
• Pucek Z, Bobek B, Łabudzki L, Miłkowski L, Morow K, Tomek A (1975) Estimates of density and number of ungulates. Acta Theriol 1:21–135
• Short J, Hone J (1988) Calibrating aerial surveys of kangaroos by comparison with drive counts. Aust Wildl Res 15:277–284
• Smart JCR, Ward AI, White PCL (2004) Monitoring woodland deer populations in the UK: an imprecise science. Mamm Rev 34:99–114
• Staines BW, Ratcliffe PR (1987) Estimating the abundance of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) and their current status in Great Britain. Symp Zool Soc Lond 58:131–152
• Strandgaard H (1967) Reliability of the Petersen method tested on a roe deer population. J Wildl Manage 31:643–651
• Sunde P, Olesen CR, Madsen TL, Haugaard L (2009) Behavioural responses of GPS-collared female red deer Cervus elaphus to driven hunts. Wildl Biol 15:454–460
• Taylor LR, Woiwod IP, Perry JN (1978) The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. J Anim Ecol 47:383–406
• Taylor LR, Woiwod IP, Perry JN (1979) The negative binomial as a dynamic ecological model for aggregation, and the density dependence of k. J Anim Ecol 48:289–304
• Thirgood SJ, Staines BW (1989) Summer use of young stands of restocked sitka spruce by red and roe deer. Scott Forest J 43:183–191
• Travis JMJ, Palmer SCF (2005) Spatial processes can determine the relationship between prey encounter rate and prey density. Biol Lett 1:136–138
• Tyre AJ, Possingham HP, Lindenmayer DB (2001) Inferring process from pattern: can territory occupancy provide information about life history parameters? Ecol Appl 11:1722–1737
• Ueckermann E (1964) Der Rehwildabschuss. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, pp 1–76
• Welch D, Staines BW, Catt DC, Scott D (1990) Habitat usage by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer in a Scottish Sitka spruce plantation. J Zool Lond 221:453–476
• White GC, Bennetts RE (1996) Analysis of frequency count data using the negative binomial distribution. Ecology 77:2549–2557
• White GC, Eberhardt LE (1980) Statistical analysis of deer and elk pellet-group data. J Wildl Manage 44:121–131
• Wunder J, Reineking B, Bigler C, Bugmann H (2008) Predicting tree mortality from growth data: how virtual ecologists can help real ecologists. J Ecol 96:174–187

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s13364-010-0023-8