PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 15 | 5 |
Tytuł artykułu

Morpho-pomological diversity of Turkish pear (Pyrus communis L.) accessions in eastern mediterranean region of Turkey

Warianty tytułu
PL
Morfologiczna i pomologiczna różnorodność tureckich odmian gruszy (Pyrus communis L.) we wschodnim śródziemnomorskim rejonie Turcji
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources is important to meet the demand for future food security. This study was conducted on twenty-five native pear accessions sampled from Hatay, province, in eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. In these accessions, ripening time, productivity, and some important pomological traits were determined such as fruit weight, fruit sizes, total soluble solids contents, pH, and acidity. The grittiness, flavor, and juiciness were also measured as sensory analysis. These results showed that the earliest ripening among the all studied accessions were ‘Biçin 1’ and ‘Biçin 2’ (June 25 in 2009 and June 23 in 2010), while the latest accessions were ‘Dağarmudu 1’ and ‘Dağarmudu 2’ (November 8 in 2009 and November 5 in 2010). In pear accessions, productivity was identified as medium and high. The fruit weight of pear accessions were ranged between 28.29 and 160.02 g, seed numbers were ranged between 0.56 and 10.00, total soluble solid contents were ranged between 10.00 and 18.50%. In pear accessions, 15 instead of all 21 of morpho-pomological fruit properties were able to explain 85.0% of the total variation. As a result, some pear accessions may be recommended for both pear cultivation and the breeding studies in terms of earliness and flavor.
PL
Ochrona i zrównoważone użycie genetycznych zasobów roślin są ważne, ponieważ zagwarantują bezpieczeństwo żywności w przyszłości. Niniejsze badanie przeprowadzono na dwudziestu pięciu odmianach z Hatay, prowincji we wschodnim śródziemnomorskim rejonie Turcji. Określono czas dojrzewania, wydajność oraz pewne ważne cechy pomologiczne, takie jak masę owoców, rozmiar owoców, całkowitą zawartość rozpuszczalnych związków stałych, pH oraz kwasowość. Zmierzono także chropowatość, zapach i soczystość w ramach analizy sensorycznej. Najwcześniej dojrzewały ‘Biçin 1’ i ‘Biçin 2’ (25 czerwca w 2009 i 23 czerwca w 2010), natomiast najpóźniej ‘Dağarmudu 1’ i ‘Dağarmudu 2’ (8 listopada w 2009 i 5 listopada w 2010). Wydajność określono jako średnią i wysoką. Masa owoców wahała się między 28,29 a 160,02 g, liczba nasion między 0,56 a 10,00, zawartość rozpuszczalnych związków stałych między 10,00 a 18,50%. U odmian gruszy, 15 zamiast wszystkich 21 cech morfo-pomologicznych owoców może wyjaśnić 85% całkowitej zmienności. W rezultacie, niektóre odmiany gruszy mogą być rekomendowane do hodowli i do badań hodowlanych w kategoriach wczesności i aromatu.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
15
Numer
5
Opis fizyczny
p.157-171,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Mustafa Kemal University, 31034, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey
autor
  • Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey
autor
  • Timur Karabal Vocational School, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • Abbot, J.A, Buta, J.G. (2002). Effect of antibrowning treatment on color and firmness of fresh-cut pears. J. Food Qual., 25(4), 333–341.
  • Agrimonti, C., Bianchi, R., Bianchi, A., Bollero, M., Poli, F., Marmiroli, N. (2007). Understanding biological conservation strategies: a molecular-genetic approach to the case of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) in two Italian regions: Sardinia and Calabria. Conservat. Gen., 8, 385–396.
  • Ahmed, M., Akbar Anjum, M., Khan Shinwari, Z., Siddique Awani, M., Ashiq Rabbani, M. (2011). Assesment of variability in fruit quality parameters of Pyrus germplasm collecred from Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Pakistan). Pak. J. Bot., 43(2), 971–981.
  • Anonymous (2010). Turkish statistical institute. www.turkstat.gov.tr Bao, L., Chen, K., Zhang, D., Li, X., Teng, Y. (2008). An assessment of genetic variability and relationships within Asian pears based on AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) markers. Sci. Hort., 116, 374–380.
  • Boonyakiat, D., Chen, P.M., Spotts, R.A, Richardson, D.G. (1987). Effect of harvest maturity on decay and post harvest life of ‘d’Anjou’ pear. Sci Hort., 31, 131–139.
  • Brini, W., Mars, M., Hormaza, J.I. (2008). Genetic diversity in local Tunisian pears (Pyrus communis L.) studied with SSR markers. Sci. Hort., 115, 337–341.
  • Brown, G.S., Walker, T.D. (1990). Indicators of maturity in apricots using biplot multivariate analysis. J. Sci. Food Agric., 53, 321–331.
  • CEC and IPGRI, 1983. Descriptor list for pear (Pyrus). http://www2.bioversityinternational.org/ publications/Web_version/156/
  • Chauvin, M.A., Ross, C.F., Pitts, M., Kupferman, E., Swanson, B. (2010). Relationshıp between instrumental and sensory determination of apple and pear texture. J. Food Qual., 33, 181–198.
  • Chen, J., Wang, Z., Wu, J., Wang, Q., Hu, X. (2007). Chemical compositional characterization of eight pear cultivars grown in China. Food Chem., 104, 268–275.
  • Dimpy, R., Dhillon, W.S., Kuldeep, S. (2011). Analysis of genetic diversity in pear germplasm using morphological traits and DNA markers. Indian J. Hortic., 68, 293–302.
  • Dumanoglu, H., Tuna Güneş, N., Erdogan, V., Aygün, A., Şan, B. (2006). Clonal selection of a winter-type European pear cultivar ‘Ankara’ (Pyrus communis L.). Turk J. Agric. For., 30, 355–363.
  • Edizer, Y., Gunes, M. (1997). Some pomological properties of local apple and pear cultivars grown in Tokat region of Turkey. Proceedings of Pome Fruit Symposium, pp. 259–266.
  • Engelmann, F. (1991). In vitro conservation of horticultural species. Acta Hort., 298, 327–332.
  • FAO (2011). FAO Statistics database on world wide web. http://app.fao.org/fao.stat.last. Gillaspy, G., David, H., Grussem, W. (1993). Fruits: a developmental perspective. The Plant Cell., 5, 1439–1451.
  • Guleryuz, M., Ercisli, S. (1997). Some pomological properties of local pear cultivars grown in Kagizman district of Turkey. Proceedings of Pome Fruit Symposium, pp. 37–44.
  • Harker, F.R., Redgwell, R.J., Hallett, I.C., Murray, S. H., Carter, G. (1997). Texture of fresh fruit. Horticult. Rev., 20, 121–224.
  • Hammer, K., Arrowsmıth, N., Gladis, T. (2003). Agrobiodiversity with emphasis on plant genetic resources. Naturwissenschaften, 90, 241–250.
  • Hudina, M. Stampar, F. (2005). The correlation of the pear (Pyrus communis L.) cv. ‘Williams’ yield quality to the foliar nutrition and water regime. Acta Agricult. Solven., 85, 179–185.
  • Kappel, F., Fisher-Fleming, R., Hogue, E.J. (1995). Ideal pear sensory attributes and fruit characteristics. Hort. Sci., 30, 988–993.
  • Karadeniz, T., Sen, S.M. (1990). Morphological and pomological properties of pears grown in Tirebolu and vicinity. J. YYU Agr. Sci., 1, 152–165.
  • Karlıdağ, H., Eşitken, A. (2006). Determination of some pomological characteristics of local apple and pear varieties grown in upper Coruh Valley. J. YYU Agr. Sci., 16(2), 93–96.
  • Katayama, H., Uematsu, C. (2006). Pear (Pyrus communis L.) genetic resources in Iwate, Japan. Gen. Res. Crop Evol., 53, 483–498.
  • Kawamura, T. (2000). Relationship between skin color and maturity of japanase pear ‘Housui’. Jap. J. Farm. Work Res., 35, 33–38.
  • Martinelli, F., Matteo, B., Fabiano, C., Corrado, F., Agostino, S., Sebastiani, L. (2008). Ancient Pomoideae (Malus domestica Borkh. and Pyrus communis L.) cultivars in ‘Appenino Toscano’ (Tuscany, Italy): molecular (SSR) and morphological characterization. Caryologia, 61(3), 320–331.
  • McGuIre, R.G. (1992). Reporting of objective color measurements. Hort.Sci., 27, 1254–1255.
  • Mellenthin, W.M., Chen, M., Kelly, S.B. (1980). Low oxygen effects on dessert quality, scald development, and nitrogen metabolism of ‘d’Anjou’ pear fruits during long-term storage. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 105, 522–527.
  • Milutinovic, M.D., Djakovic, G., Militinic, M.M., Miletic, R., Zikic, M. (2004). Variability in the wild pear population in West Serbia. Acta Hort., 671, 247–251.
  • Özbek, S. (1978). Ozel Meyvecilik. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 128 Ders Kitabi 11, Adana (in Turkish). Özrenk, K., Gündoğdu, M., Kann, T. (2010). Local pears in Van Lake basin. J. YYU Agr. Sci., 20(1), 46–51.
  • Ozturk, I., Ercisli, S., Kalkan, F., Demir, B. (2010). Some chemical and physico-mechanical properties of pear cultivars. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8(4), 687–693.
  • Pereira-Lorenzo, S., Ramos-Cabrer, A.M., Ascasibar-Errasti, J., Piñeiro-Andión, J. (2003). Analysis of apple germplasm in Northwestern Spain. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 128, 67–84.
  • Pereira-Lorenzo, S., Ferreira dos Santos, A.R., Ramos-Cabrer, A.M., Sau, F., Díaz-Hernández, M.B. (2012). Morphological variation in local pears from north-western. Spain Sci Hort., 138, 176–182.
  • Rohlf, F.J. (1998). NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.0. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.
  • Rotondi, A., Magli, M., Ricciolini, C., Baldoni, L. (2003). Morphological and molecular analyses for the characterization of a group of Italian olive cultivars. Euphytica, 132(2), 129–137.
  • SAS Institute (2005). SAS Online Doc, Version 9.1.3. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
  • Weiguo, Z., Zhihua, Z., Xuexia, M., Yong, Z., Sibao, W., Jianhua, H., Hui, X., Yile, P., Yongping, H. (2007). A comparison of genetic variation among wild and cultivated Morus species (Moraceae: Morus) as revealed by ISSR and SSR markers. Biodivers. Conserv., 16, 275–290.
  • Westwood, M.N., Blaney, L.T. (1963). Non-climatic factors affecting the shape of apple fruits. Nature, 200, 802–803.
  • Yarılgac, T., Yıldız, K. (2001). Some pomological characteristics of local pear varieties grown in Adilcevaz. J. YYU Agr. Sci., 11(2), 9–12.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-08f01f88-69a0-4b89-9db1-a86c0f5d55a3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.