Biodiversity in morphological and physico-chemical characteristics of wild raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) germplasm collected from temperate region of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Pakistan)

• Autorzy: Ahmed M. , Anjum M. A. , Khaqan K. , Hussain S.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Różnorodność biologiczna w morfologicznych i fizyko-chemicznych cechach materiału genetycznego maliny właściwej (Rubus idaeus L.) zbieranej w regionie umiarkowanym Azad Jammu i Kaszmiru (Pakistan)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Wild raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) is abundantly grown and widely distributed in temperate regions of lower Himalayan range which represents rich biological diversity for raspberry. Thirty accessions were explored from three different locations of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Pakistan), several traits were visualized at sampling locations and some characteristics were evaluated and quantified after harvest of leaf and fruit samples. The accessions differed greatly in growth habit, blooming time, intensity of flowering, fruit setting, ripening time, productivity, fruit shape and color. Concerning quantitative characteristics, significant differences were found in plant height, leaf length and width, number of braches per plant, duration of flowering, fruit setting percentage, days to maturity, fruit length, width and weight among the samples collected from different locations. Ripe fruits were evaluated for their chemical composition i.e. moisture, carbohydrates, protein, fat, fiber, ash, TSS, acidity, pH and mineral (K, Ca, Na, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb, and Cr) contents. The location also had significant effect on chemical composition of ripe fruits.

PL

Malina właściwa (Rubus idaeus L.) jest często hodowana i szeroko rozprowadzana w umiarkowanych rejonach niższego pasma Himalajów, które reprezentuje bogatą różnorodność biologiczną malin. Zbadano trzydzieści próbek z trzech różnych miejsc Azad Jammu i Kaszmiru (Pakistan), dokonano wizualizacji kilkunastu cech w miejscach pobierania próbek oraz oceniono i ilościowo określono kilka cech po zebraniu próbek liści i owoców. Próbki znacznie różniły się wzrostem, czasem kwitnienia, intensywnością zakwitania, zawiązywaniem owoców, czasem dojrzewania, plonowaniem oraz kształtem i kolorem owoców. Jeśli chodzi o cechy ilościowe, to stwierdzono istotne różnice w wysokości roślin, długości i szerokości liści, liczbie gałązek na roślinie, długości kwitnienia, procencie zawiązywanych owoców, liczbie dni do dojrzałości, długości owoców, szerokości i wadze pomiędzy próbkami zebranymi z różnych stanowisk. Dojrzałe owoce oceniono pod względem składu chemicznego, tzn. wilgotności, zawartości węglowodanów, białka, tłuszczu, błonnika, popiołu, TSS, kwasowości, pH oraz zawartości minerałów (K, Ca, Na, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb oraz Cr). Stanowisko także miało istotny wpływ na skład chemiczny dojrzałych owoców.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biodiversity; morphological characteristics; physicochemical characteristics; wild plant; raspberry; Rubus idaeus; germplasm; temperate region; Azad Jammu and Kashmir; Pakistan

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 13
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.117-134,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Ahmed M.

• Mirpur University of Science and Technology, Mirpur, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan

autor

Anjum M. A.

• Department of Horticulture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan

autor

Khaqan K.

• The University of Poonch, Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan

autor

Hussain S.

• Department of Horticulture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan

Bibliografia

• AACC, 2000. Approved Methods of American Association of Cereal Chemists. American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc., St. Paul Minnesota, USA.
• Ahmed M., Anjum M.A., Naz R.M.M., Khan M.R. Hussain S., 2013. Characterization of indigenous barberry germplasm: variability in morphological characteristics and nutritional composition. Fruits, 68, 409–422.
• AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA.
• Badjakov I., Nikolova M., Gevrenova R., Kondakova V., Todorovska E., Atanassov A., 2008. Bioactive compounds in small fruits and their influence on human health. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 22, 581–587.
• Behboudian M.H., Lawes G.S., Griffiths K.M., 1994. The influence of water deficit on water relations, photosynthesis and fruit growth in Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.). Sci. Hortic., 60, 89–99.
• Caspari H.W., Behboudian M.H., Chalmers D.G., 1994. Water use, growth, and fruit yield of ‘Housi’ Asian pears under deficit irrigation. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 119, 383–388.
• Celik F., Ercisli S., 2009. Lipid and fatty acid composition of wild and cultivated red raspberry fruits (Rubus idaeus L.). J. Med. Plant. Res., 3, 583–585.
• Eyduran S.P., Agaoglu Y.S., 2006. A preliminary examination regarding ten raspberry cultivars. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 2, 375–379.
• Garriz P.I., Colavita G.M., Alvarez H.L., 1998. Fruit and spur leaf growth and quality as influenced by low irradiance levels in pear. Sci. Hortic., 77, 195–205.
• Glisic I., Milosevic T., Veljkovic B., Glisic I., Milosevic N., 2009. Trellis height effect on the production characteristics of raspberry. Acta Hortic., 825, 389–393.
• Gwozdecki J., Krzewińska D., Pierzga K., Bakum M., 1996. An evaluation of ‘Polana’ raspberry. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 2, 69–71.
• Han J., HxinHua N.B., JiWen L., Patar A., Shabor M., 2008. Study on the nutritional components of raspberry fruits and their effects on antioxidant activity. Nurd. Acta Nutr. Sinica., 30, 410–413.
• HanPing D., ZhiJie X., XiuWu G., 2009. Studies on physiological and biochemical characteristics of raspberry canes under natural overwintering condition. J. Jilin. Agric. Univ., 31, 573–577.
• Hristov S., Stoyanova T., Minev I., 2009. Raspberry cultivars for fruit production under mountain conditions. Acta Hortic., 825, 221–224.
• Jennings D.L., Daubeny H.A., Moore J.N., 1990. Blackberries and raspberries, Acta Hortic., 290, 329–391.
• Kafkas E., Ozgen M., Ozogul Y., Turemis N., 2008. Phytochemical and fatty acid profile of selected red raspberry cultivars: A comparative study. J. Food Qual., 31, 67–78.
• Latrasse A., Dupuy P., 1973. Composition of red raspberry grown in different climatic areas in France. Jugoslav Pomol., 25–26, 107–116.
• Lone A.F., Wafal B.A., 2000. Varietal diversity in the germplasm of cherries under cultivation in Kashmir. In: Environmental biodiversity and conservation, Khan M.A., Farooq S., (eds). A.P.H. Publishing, New Delhi, 319–340.
• Lotze E., Bergh O., 2004. Early prediction of harvest fruit size distribution of an apple and pear cultivar. Sci. Hortic., 101, 281–290.
• Maikhuri R.K., Semwal R.L., Singh A., Nautiyal M.C., 1994. Wild fruits as a contribution to sustainable rural development: a case study from the Garhwal Himalaya. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World Ecol., 1, 56–68.
• Ochmian I., Skupien K., 2008. Comparison of field performance, fruit firmness, and nutritional value of yellow- and red-fruit Polish raspberry cultivars. EJPAU, 11, 4, 12, www.ejpau.media.pl
• Palmer J.W., 1981. Computed effects of spacing on light interception and distribution within hedgerow trees in relation to productivity. Acta Hortic., 114, 80–88.
• Patamsyte J., Zvingila D., Labokas J., Baliuckas V., Balciuniene L., Kleizaite V., Ancelis V., 2008. Study of genetic diversity in wild raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) germplasm collection using morphological characters and RAPD markers. Biologia, 54, 66–74.
• Pearson D., Melon H.K., Ronald S., 1976. Chemical Analysis of Food (8th ed.). Churchill Livingstone, USA, 5–63.
• Plessi M., Bertelli D., Albasini A., 2007. Distribution of metals and phenolic compounds as a criterion to evaluate variety of berries and related jams. Food Chem., 100, 419–427.
• Pritts M., Handley D., 1989. Bramble production guide. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Services Bulletin 35. Cornell University, New York. R.H.S., 2001. Colour chart. Royal Horticultural Society. London.
• Romoleroux K., 1992. Rosaceae in the parmos of Ecuador. In: Parame: an andean ecosystem under human influence, Balslev H., Luteyn J.L., (eds). Academic Press, London, 85–94.
• Ryabova D., 2007. An evaluation of Rubus idaeus L. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 54, 973–80.
• Singh S.K., Bist L.D., Patel V.B., 2004. Flowering and floral biology studies in low chill pear cultivars. Ind. J. Hort., 61, 94–96.
• Strik B.C., 2008. A review of nitrogen nutrition of Rubus. Acta Hortic., 777, 403–410.
• Verissimo V., Gardin J.P., Trevisan R., de Silva J.B., 2002. Morphological and physical parameters of the flower buds of the trees of two Japanese pear cultivars grown at three different areas of Southern Brazil and their relationship with flower bud abortion intensity. Acta Hortic., 587, 381–386.
• Zaffar G., Mir M.S., Sofi A.A., 2004. Genetic divergence among apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes of Kargil, Ladakh. Ind. J. Hort., 61, 6–9.