Concept of application of the light-weight robot Robin Heart (“Pelikan”) in veterinary medicine: a feasibility study

• Autorzy: Lis K. , Lehrich K. , Mucha L. , Nawrat Z.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Currently, there is a great interest in the use of minimally invasive surgery methods. Such surgeries require special instrumentation. Doctors increasingly use medical robots that replace assistants responsible for setting the position and orientation of the endoscope (vision), as well as make it possible to control surgical instruments. One of very promising fields of expansion of this technology is veterinary medicine. This article presents a review of literature on animal laparoscopic surgery with the use of medical robots. Particular attention was paid to animal experiments involving the Robin Heart family robots. Moreover, the article presents the construction and principle of operation of the smallest manipulator of the Robin Heart family, as well as describes preliminary simulations of surgery with the use of this robot. In the conclusion, possible directions for further improvement and implementation of the Robin Heart robot have been formulated.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 73
• Numer: 02
• Opis fizyczny: p.88-91,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Lis K.

• Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18a, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

autor

Lehrich K.

• Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18a, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

autor

Mucha L.

• Foundation of Cardiac Surgery Development, Biocybernetics Laboratory, Wolnosci 345a, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

autor

Nawrat Z.

• Foundation of Cardiac Surgery Development, Biocybernetics Laboratory, Wolnosci 345a, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

Bibliografia

• Boehm D. H., Reichenspurner H., Gulbins H., Detter C., Meiser B., Brenner P., Habazettl H., Reichart B.: Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999, 68, 1542-1546.
• Bowersox J. C., Shah A., Jensen J., Hill J., Cordts P. R., Green P. S.: Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine. J. Vasc. Surg. 1996, 23, 281-287.
• Cosford K. L., Shmon C. L., Myers S. L., Taylor S. M., Carr A. P., Steiner J. M., Suchodolski J. S., Prospective F.: Evaluation of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Biopsies in 11 Healthy Cats. Mantovani, J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 1, 104-113.
• Davidson E. B., Moll H. D., Payton M. E.: Comparison of laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy and ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet. Surgery 2014, 33, 62-69.
• Devitt C. M., Cox R. E., Hailey J. J.: Duration, Complication, Stress and Pain of Open Ovariohysterectomy Versus a Simple Method of Laparoscopic-Assisted Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 2005, 227, 921-928.
• Fransson B. A., Mayhew P. D.: Small Animal Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy. Chichester, West Sussex; Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell 2015.
• Hollands C. M., Dixey N., Torma M. J.: Technical assessment of porcine enteroenterostomy performed with Zeus robotic technology. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2001, 36, 1231-1233.
• Lanfranco A. R., Castellanos A. E., Desai J. P., Meyers W. C.: Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Anim. Surgery 2004, 239, 14-21.
• Lehrich K., Mucha Ł., Rohr K., Nawrat Z., Lis K.: Zastosowanie technologii druku 3D w konstrukcji prototypów manipulatorów medycznych. Mechanik 2016, 3, 224-225.
• Lomanto D., Cheah W. K., So J. B., Goh P. M.: Robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study. Arch. Surg. 2001, 136, 1106-1108.
• Margossian H., Garcia-Ruiz A., Falcone T., Goldberg J. M., Attaran M., Gagner M.: Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis. Fertil. Steril. 1998, 70, 530-534.
• Mucha Ł.: Interfejs użytkownika robota – przegląd urządzeń zadawania ruchu systemów sterowania telemanipulatorów. Medical Robotics Reports 2015, 4, 39-48.
• Nawrat Z., Rohr K., Fürjes P., Mucha Ł., Lis K., Radó J., Dücső C., Földesy P., Sadowski W., Krawczyk D., Kroczek P., Szebényi G., Soósd P., Małota Z.: Force Feedback Control System Dedicated for Robin Heart Surgical Robot. 30th Eurosensors Conference, EUROSENSORS 2016, Proc. Engineering, Budapest 2016, 00, 1-5.
• Religa G., Zembala M., Cichoń R., Nawrat N., Kostka P., Dybka W., Rohr K., Podsędkowski L., Śliwka.: Pierwsze eksperymenty na zwierzętach robota chirurgicznego Robin Heart. Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka 2010, 2, 539-545.
• Rubino F., Nahouraii R., Deutsch H., King W., Inabnet W. B., Gagner M.: Endoscopic approach for carotid artery surgery. Surg. Endosc. 2002, 16, 789-794.
• Ruurda J. P., Broeders I. A.: Robot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis. Surg. Endosc. 2003, 17, 236-241.
• Schippers E., Tittel A., Ottinger A., Schumpelick V.: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesion-formation after bowel resection in a canine model. Dig. Surg. 1998, 15, 145-147.
• Sterbis J. R., Hanly E. J., Herman B. C., Marohn M. R., Broderick T. J., Shih S. P., Harnett B., Doarn C., Schenkman N. S.: Transcontinental telesurgical nephrectomy using the da Vinci robot in a porcine model. Urology 2008, 71, 971-973.
• Zhu J. F., Nahouraii R., Rubino F., Pamoukian V. N., Gagner M.: Roboticassisted laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 2001, 10, 83-88.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21521/mw.5640