PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 20 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Nutritional variation and drought tolerance in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Pulses are an important dietary constituent in human and animal diets. As well as being a source of income and livestock feed, pulses satisfy 33% of the dietary protein nitrogen (N) needs of humans. Pulses are often exposed to environmental stresses (biotic and abiotic) that decrease their productivity throughout the world. Abiotic stresses (drought, salt, temperature, UV, nutrient deficiency) alone are responsible for more than 50% yield reductions of some major crops. The following examination of drought stress types (no irrigation, early period stress, late period stress, control) of 10 chickpea genotypes from Turkey was carried out for two years (2010 and 2011) in a field experiment set up accoding to a randomized complete block design with three replications and conducted under the ecological conditions prevalent in Konya, Turkey. The investigated nutrition-related parameters were the seed concentrations of protein, fat, ash, fiber, moisture, non-nitrogenous pith substances and minerals. Means achieved under the particular stress types showed that the protein percentage ranged from 19.71% to 19.80%, fat – 4.640 to 4.690%, ash – 2.810 to 2.860%, fiber – 7.360 to 7.400%, moisture – 9.150 to 9.180%, non-nitrogenous pith substances – 56.16 to 56.25%, while the mineral content (mg kg-1) corresponded to the following ranges: 9.700 to 9.980 B, 68.32 to 79.44 for Fe, 8866.3 to 8912.4 for K, 1383.1 to 1410.3 for Mg, 21.99 to 23.85 Mn, 3148.0 to 3192.6 P, 1815.6 to 1835.4 for S and from 25.81 to 28.43 for Zn. In general, the content of protein, magnesium and sulfur showed the lowest values under no irrigation conditions, while the content of ash, non-nitrogenous pith substances, boron, potassium, phosphorus and zinc showed the highest values under no irrigation conditions. Additionally, the nutritional value of chickpea seeds showed significant differences for all of the investigated characteristics viewed in terms of triple interactions (year x stress factor x genotype). The present research results can be useful for farmers, plant breeders, food companies etc., interested in chickpea. Finally, responses of the genotypes to different levels of drought stress were modified by the investigated quality characteristics.
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
20
Numer
2
Opis fizyczny
p.331-341,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Field Crops, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey
autor
  • Department of Field Crops, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey
  • Department of Soil Sciences and Plant Nutrition, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • Ahmad M., Hussain M., Shafique M. 2002. Important macro- and microelements in chickpea and lentil nuclear institute for agriculture and biology (Niab). The Nucleus, 39(1-2): 101-105.
  • Ak E.E. 2001. A study on some quality characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and interrelationships. MSc., Ege University, İzmir, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  • Anonymous, 1989. Nrc/Nas, B. Recommended dietary allowances (10th Ed.). Washington DC, USA, National Academy Press, P. 302.
  • AOAC. 1984. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists. 14th ed. Washington, DC.
  • Aslam M., Shaheen F.A., Abb as M.A., Saba A. 2006. Management of Callosobruchus Chinensis L. through use of resistance in stored chickpea varieties. World J. Agric. Sci., 2(1): 82-84. http://www.idosi.org/wjas/wjas2(1)/12.pdf
  • Burt R. (ed.) 2004. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Laboratory Investigations Report No: 42. USDA-NRCS. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/lmm/Bagci E. 2010. Determination of physiological and biochemical parameters symptomatic for oxidative stres in chickpea cultivars under drought. Ph.D., Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  • Burstin J., Marget P., Huart M., Moessner A., Mangin B., Duchene C. 2007. Developmental genes have pleiotropic effects on plant morphology and source capacity, eventually impacting on seed protein content and productivity in pea. Plant Physiol., 144: 768-781. http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/144/2/768.full.pdf+html
  • Cai R., Mccurdy A.R., Baik B.K. 2002. Textural properties of six legume curds in relation to their protein constituents. J. Food Sci., 67: 1725-1730. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08713.x/pdf
  • Ceyhan E., Onder M., Harmankaya M., Hamurcu M., Gezgin S. 2007. Response of chickpea cultivars to application of boron in boron-deficient calcareous soils. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 38(17-18): 2381-2391. DOI: 10.1080/00103620701588734
  • Ceyhan E., Harmankaya M., Avcı M.A. 2008. Effects of sowing dates and cultivars on protein and mineral contents of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Asian J. Chem., 20(7): 5601-5613. http://www.asianjournalofchemistry.co.in/user/SearchArticle.aspx?Volume=20&Issue=7
  • Champ M. 2002. Non-nutrient bioactive substances of pulses. Br. J. Nutrit., 3: 307-319. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002721
  • Clemente A., Moreno F.J., Marín-Manzano M.C., Jimenez E., Domoney C. 2009. The cytotoxic effect of Bowman–Birk isoinhibitors, IBB1 and IBBD2, from soybean (Glycine max) on HT29 human colorectal cancer cells is related to their intrinsic ability to inhibit serine proteases. Mol. Nutr. Food Res., 54: 396-405. DOI: 10.1002/MNFR.200900122
  • Costa G.A., Queirozmonici K. S., Soely M.P.C., Oliveira A.C. 2004. Chemical composition, dietary fibre and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes. Food Chem., 34(3): 327-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem. 2004.11.020
  • Gomez M., Oliete B., Rosell C.M., Pando V., Fernandez E. 2007. Studies on cake quality made of wheat-chickpea flour blends. LWT - Food Sci. Technol., 41(9): 1701-1709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.024
  • Graham, P.H., Vance C.P. 2003. Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol., 131: 872-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104
  • Haq M.Z.U., Iqbal S., Shakeel A., Imran M., Niaz A., Bhanger M. 2007. Nutritional and compositional study of Desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) cultivars grown in Punjab, Pakistan. Food Chem., 105(4): 1357-1363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.004
  • Harmankaya M., Karadaş S., Palta Ç., Ceyhan E. 2009. Relationships between protein content and chemical compositions of local dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes grown in Turkey. Asian J. Chem., 20(7): 5601-5613. http://www.asianjournalofchemistry.co.in/user/SearchArticle.aspx?Volume=21&Issue=2
  • Ibanez M.V., Rincon F., Amaro M., Martinez B. 1997. Intrinsic variability of mineral composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). Food Chem., 63(1): 55-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0308-8146(97)00221-5
  • Iqbal A., Khail I.A., Ateg N., Khan M.S. 2004. Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chem., 97: 331-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.011
  • Isik E., Guler T. 2004. Determination of rupture strees of canıtez chickpea under applied force with change in humidity. J. Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 18(1): 25-31. (in Turkish)
  • Kacar O., Çakmak F., Çoplu N., Azkan F. 2004. Determination of the effect of rhizobium inoculation and different nitrogen doses on yield and yield components of some chickpea varieties and lines (Cicer arietinum L.) in Bursa conditions. J. Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 18(2): 123-135. (in Turkish) http://ucmaz.home.uludag.edu.tr/PDF/ziraat/2004-18(2)/mak11.pdf
  • Khan M.A , Akhtar N., Ullah N.I., Jaffery S. 1995. Nutritional evaluation of desi and kabuli chickpeas and their products commonly consumed in Pakistan. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutrit., 46(3): 215-223. http://www.aiou.edu.pk/foodsite/Research%20Papers/55.pdf
  • Leport L., Turner N.C., Davies S.L., Sidd ique K.H.M. 2006. Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought. Eur. J. Agron., 24(3): 236-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.005
  • Leport L., Turner N.C., French R.J., Barr M.D., Duda R., Davies S.L., Tennant D., Siddique K.H.M. 1999. Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. Eur. J. Agron., 11: 279-291. http://www.pe.wzw.tum.de/publikationen/pdf/sd450.pdf
  • Maheri S.N., Chamani M., Sadeghi A.S., Aghazadeh A.Z., Golshani A.A. 2008. Nutritional evaluation of kabuli and desi type chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L) for ruminants using in vitro gasproduction technique. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7(16): 2946-2951. http://www.academicjournals. org/AJB
  • Mccarthy M.A., Murphy E.W., Ritchey S.J., Washburn P.C. 1977. Mineral content of legumes as related to nutrition labeling. Food Technol., 31(2): 86-91.
  • Mut Z., Gulumser A. 2005. The effects of bacteria inoculation, zinc and molybdenum application on some quality traits of Damla-89 chickpea cultivar. J. Agricultural Faculty of Ondokuz Mayıs University, 20(2): 1-10. (in Turkish)
  • Nassar A.G., Mubarak A.E., El-Beltagy A.E. 2008. Nutritional potential and functional properties of tempe produced from mixture of different legumes chemical composition and nitrogenous constituent. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 43: 1754-1758. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2007.01683.x
  • Patane C. 2006. Variation and relationships among some nutritional traits in sicilian genotypes of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Food Qual., 29(3): 282-293.
  • Poniedziałek M., Jedryszczyk E., Sekara A., Dziamba S., Bobrowska B., Skowera B. 2002. The effect of locality and sowing terms on the content of some elements in chickpea seeds (Cicer arietinum L.). Fol. Hort., V., 14(2): 113-118.
  • Saglam M. 2001. Influence of effective bacteria (Rhizobium ciceri) applied with nitrogenous and phosphorus fertilizers on the yield and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). MSc., Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  • Sekhon H.S., Singh G. 2007. Irrigation management in chickpea. In: Chickpea breeding & management. Yadav S.S., Redd en R., Chen W. and Sharma B. (Eds). CAB International.
  • Shimelis E.A., Rakshit S.K. 2005. Proximate composition and physico-chemical properties of improved dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in Ethiopia. LWT, 38: 331-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2004.07.002
  • Singh G.D., Wani A.A., Kaur D., Sogi D.S. 2008. Characterisation and functional properties of proteins of some Indian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. ) cultivars. J. Sci Food Agric., 88: 778-786. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3144
  • Toker C., Cagirgan M.I. 1998. Assessment of response to drought stress of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) lines under rainfed conditions. Turk. J. Agric. Forest., 22(6): 615-621. http://journals. tubitak.gov.tr/agriculture/issues/tar-98-22-6/tar-22-6-13-97023.pdf
  • Wang N., Daun J.K. 2004. The chemical composition and nutritive value of Canadian pulses. Canadian Grain Commission (Cgc), Pp. 19-29. http://www.pulsecanada.com/uploads/c4/91/c491f652f0cf53390d9a5b86aa63aeea/The-Chemical-Composition-and-Nutritive-Value-of-Canadian-Pulses.pdf
  • Wang N., Hatcher D.W., ToewS R., Gawalko E.J. 2009. Influence of cooking and dehulling on nutritional composition of several varieties of lentils (Lens culinaris). Food Sci. Technol., 42:842-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2008.10.007
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-0584e0b1-2212-4e54-aee3-086223ebfbd7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.