PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2016 | 76 |
Tytuł artykułu

Investigation of Ophiostoma population infected elms in Poland

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Dutch elm disease (DED) still occurs in Poland. Previous studies confirmed occurring O. ulmi and two subspecies of O. novo-ulmi: subsp. novo-ulmi and subsp. amerciana. In this study the population of Ophiostoma occurred in Poland was investigated. The disease incidence was investigated on elms growing in 39 locations. The pathogen’s mycelium was isolated from elm branches and twigs collected from 22 plots. The disease symptoms were noted in 5% to 35% trees. Fungi were identified based on the PCR amplification of the ITS 1/2 rDNA together with phylogenetic analysis of this region. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi was the only agent caused DED on Ulmus glabra, U. minor and U. laevis. There were no genetic diversity of O. novo-ulmi Polish population in analyzed ITS region. All kind of specific symptoms and disease intensity occurred independently on elm species and host age. Ulmus minor was infested most sever among the three elms species.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
76
Opis fizyczny
p.137-144,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Forest Pathology, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland
autor
  • Department of Forest Pathology, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland
autor
  • Department of Forest Entomology, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  • Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Science, Kornik, Poland
autor
  • Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Science, Kornik, Poland
  • Institute of Landscape Architecture, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Forest Pathology, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  • Department of Forest Pathology, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Anagnostakis SL (2007) Diaporthe eres (Phomopsis oblonga) as a pathogen of butternut (Juglans cinerea) in Connecticut. Plant Disease 91: 1198.
  • Bartnik C, Michalcewicz J & Ciach M (2015) Dutch elm disease and the habitat of endangered Rosalia longicorn Rosalia alpina (L.): A conservation paradox? Polish Journal of Ecology 63: 440–447.
  • Brasier CM (1991) Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115: 151–161.
  • Brasier CM (1996) New horizons in Dutch elm disease control: Report for Forest Research, HMSO, London, pp. 20–28.
  • Brasier CM & Kirk SA (2001) Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novoulmi as subspecies. Mycological Research 105: 547–554.
  • Brasier CM & Kirk SA (2010) Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. Plant Pathology 59: 186–199.
  • Brasier CM, Kirk SA, Pipe ND & Buck KW (1998) Rare interspecific hybrids in natural populations of the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi. Mycological Research 102: 45–57.
  • Buttin von H & Kowalski T (1986) Die natürliche Astreiningung und ihre biologischen Voraussetzungen. III. Die Pilzflora von Ahorn, Erle, Birke, Hainbuche und Esche. European Journal of Forest Pathology 16: 129–138.
  • Danielewicz W (2008) Ekologiczne uwarunkowania zasięgów drzew i krzewów na aluwialnych obszarach doliny Odry. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego, Poznań.
  • Domański S & Kowalski T (1984) O procesie chorobowym Alnus incana (L.) Mönch i udziale w nim grzybów patogenicznych na wybranych powierzchniach GOP. Reakcje biologiczne drzew na zanieczyszczenia przemysłowe. Materiały II Krajowego Sympozjum (ed. by R Siwecki) Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań, pp. 289–294.
  • Faccoli M & Battisti A (1997) Observations on the Transmission of Ophiostoma ulmi by the smaller elm bark beetles (Scolytus spp.): Proceedings of a IUFRO Meeting: Integrating cultural tactics into the management of bark beetle and reforestation pests (ed. by JC Grégoire, AM Liebhold, FM Stephen, KR Day & SM Salom) USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-236, pp. 172–176.
  • Filipiak M & Napierała-Filipiak A (2015) Zarys ekologii: Wiązy (ed. by W Bugała, A Boratyński & G Iszkuło) Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 133–181.
  • Gardes M & Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for Basidiomycetes – Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118.
  • Głaz J (1986) Wiąz w Lasach Państwowych. Sylwan 130: 23-33.
  • Guździoł E, Przybył K & Pałucha A (2004) Grzyby rodzaju Ophiostoma związane z holenderską choroba wiązów w Polsce: Choroby roślin na tle środowiska. 85 lat Fitopatologii w Wielkopolsce 50 lat Katedry Fitopatologii Leśnej. Konferencja Jubileuszowa, 18–19 listopada 2004, Poznań. (ed. by M Mańka & Z Weber) 181.
  • Jacobi WR, Koski RD & Negron JF (2013) Dutch elm disease pathogen transmission by the banded elm bark beetle Scolytus schevyrewi. Forest Pathology 43: 232–237.
  • Kaliterna J, Miličević T & Cvjetković B (2012) Grapevine trunk diseases associated with fungi from the Diaporthaceae family in Croatian vineyards. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology 63: 471–479.
  • Kirisits T, Krumbock S, Konrad H, Pennerstorfer J & Halmschlager E (2001) Investigations on the occurrence of the Dutch elm disease pathogens in Austria. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt vereinigt mit Tharandter forstliches Jahrbuch 120: 231–241.
  • Konrad H, Kirisits T, Riegler M, Halmschlager E & Stauffer C (2002) Genetic evidence for natural hybridization between the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. novo-ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. americana. Plant Pathology 51: 78–84.
  • Kowalski T (1991) Oak decline: I. Fungi associated with various disease symptoms on overground portions of middle-aged and old oak (Quercus robus L.). European Journal of Forest Pathology 21: 136–151.
  • Kowalski T (1996) Występowanie grzybów w nekrotycznych tkankach pni i gałęzi Quercus robur L. zależnie od wieku. Materiały z Sympozjum “Nowe kierunki w fitopatologii”, Kraków 11–13 września 1996: 93–98.
  • Kwaśna H & Siwecki R (2002) Przyczyny zamierania siewek i młodych szadzonek dębu w Nadleśnictwie Smolarz. Sylwan 146: 91–107.
  • Mańka K (2005) Fitopatologia Leśna. PWRiL, Warszawa.
  • Mańka K, Bałązy S, Chwaliński K & Michalski J (1978) Odporność wiązów w Poznaniu i okolicy na holenderską chorobę wiązu. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 198: 251–265.
  • Napierała-Filipiak A, Filipiak M & Jaworek J (2014) Rozmieszczenie zasobów drzew z rodzaju wiąz (Ulmus spp.) w lasach Polski w świetle dokumentacji leśnej. Sylwan 158: 811-820.
  • Napierała-Filipiak A, Filipiak M, Łakomy P, Kuźmiński R & Gubański J (2016) Changes in elm (Ulmus) populations of mid-western Poland during the past 35 years. Dendrobiology 76: 145–156.
  • Oheimb G & Brunet J (2007) Dalby Soderskog revisited: Long-term vegetation changes in a south Swedish deciduous forest. Acta Oecologica 31: 229–242.
  • Peterken GF & Mountford EP (1998) Long-term change in an unmanaged population of elm subjected to Dutch elm disease. Journal of Ecology 86: 205–218.
  • Przybył K, Dahm H, Ciesielska A & Moliński K (2006) Cellulolytic activity and virulence of Ophiostoma ulmi and O-novo-ulmi isolates. Forest Pathology 36: 58–67.
  • Santini A, Montaghi A, Vendramin GG & Capretti P (2005) Analysis of the Italian Dutch elm disease fungal population. Journal of Phytopathology 153: 73–79.
  • Solheim H, Eriksen R & Hietala AM (2011) Dutch elm disease has currently a low incidence on wych elm in Norway. Forest Pathology 41: 182–188.
  • Solla A, Dacasa MC, Nasmith C, Hubbes M & Gil L (2008) Analysis of Spanish populations of Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi using phenotypic characteristics and RAPD markers. Plant Pathology 57: 33–44.
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Steche G, Nei M & Kumar S (2011) MEGA 5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, distance and parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739.
  • Thomidis T & Michailides TJ (2009) Studies on Diaporthe eres as a new pathogen of peach trees in Greece. Plant Disease 93: 1293–1297.
  • Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F & Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882.
  • Webber JF (1990) Relative effectiveness of Scolytus scolytus, S. multistriatus, and S. kirschii as vectors of Dutch elm disease. European Journal of Forest Pathology 20: 184–192.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S & Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics: PCR Protocols: A guide to methods and applications (ed. by MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky & TJ White), Academic Press, San Diego, U.S.A., pp. 315–322.
  • Vrandečić K, Jurković D, Ćosić J, Postić J & Riccioni L (2011) First report of cane blight on blackberry caused by Diaporthe eres in Croatia. Plant Disease 95: 612.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-03075904-851a-4d30-b49c-147435af619d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.