PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 58 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Effect of D genome on wheat anther culture response after cold and mannitol pretreatment

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The present study was conducted to determine the effect of the D genome on embryoid induction and green plant regeneration in wheat anther culture and how it is influenced by low temperature and mannitol treatment. For this reason, the anther culture response of two Canadian bread wheat cultivars and their extracted tetraploids (AABB) was studied. As controls two cultivars well responding to anther-culture (i.e. cvs. Kavkaz/Cgn and Acheron) and a no-responding cultivar (cv. Vergina) were used. Approximately 3000 anthers of these cultivars were cultured and three pre-treatments were applied: cold pre-treatment for 7 and 18 days at 4°C, and 0.3M mannitol for seven days at 4°C. W14 and 190-2 were used as induction and regeneration media, respectively, and the basic MS medium as the rooting medium. No green plants were produced from the tetraploids, which supports the view that the D-genome chromosomes are necessary for androgenic response in wheat. Furthermore, the Canadian cultivars performed better after 18-day pre-treatment at 4°C. The extracted tetraploids produced fewer embryoids and performed better after seven days of cold pre-treatment. The controls well responding to anther culture performed better than the Canadian cultivars, although their best response was recorded after seven-day cold pre-treatment. Cultivar Vergina produced no green plants. The presence of mannitol influenced negatively both embryoid and green plant production. It was concluded that the D genome plays a crucial role in anther culture response of wheat and that this response is influenced by both the genotype and the duration of cold pre-treatment.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
58
Numer
1
Opis fizyczny
p.95-102,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Technological Education Institute of Western Macedonia - School of Agriculture Technology, Food Technology and Nutrition, 53100 Florina, Greece
autor
  • Laboratory of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
autor
  • Technological Education Institute of Western Macedonia - School of Agriculture Technology, Food Technology and Nutrition, 53100 Florina, Greece
autor
  • Laboratory of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Bibliografia
  • AGACHE S, BACHELLER B, DE BUYSER J, HENRY Y, and SNAPE J. 1989. Genetic analysis of anther culture in wheat using aneuploid, chromosome substitution and translocation lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 77: 7–11.
  • BARNABÁS B, SZAKACS E, KARSAI I, and BEDO Z. 2001. In vitro androgenesis of wheat: from fundamentals to practical application. Euphytica 119: 211–216.
  • CAREDDA S, DONCOEUR C, DEVAUX P, SANGWAN R, and CLEMENT C. 2000. Plastid differentiation during androgenesis in albino and non albino producing cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Sexual Plant Reproduction 13: 95–104.
  • CASTILLO AM, SANCHEZ–DIAZ RA, and VALLES MP. 2015. Effect of ovary induction on bread wheat anther culture: ovary genotype and developmental stage and candidate gene association. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00402
  • CASTILLO AM, VALLES MP, and CISTUÉ L. 2000. Comparison of anther and isolated microspores cultures in barley. Effects of culture density and regeneration medium. Euphytica 113: 1–8.
  • CISTUÉ L, ROMAGOSA I, BATLLE F, and ECHÀVARRI B. 2009. Improvements in the production of doubled haploids in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) through isolated microspore. Plant Cell Reports 28: 727–735.
  • CISTUÉ L, SORIANO M, CASTILLO AM, VALLÉS MP, SANZ JM, and
  • ECHÀVARRI B. 2006. Production of doubled haploids in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) through isolated microspore. Plant Cell Reports 25: 257–264.
  • GHAEMI M, SARRAFI A, and MORRIS R. 1995. Reciprocal substitutions analysis of embryo induction and plant regeneration from anther culture in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome 38: 158–165.
  • GHAEMI M, and SARRAFI A. 1994. The effect of the “D” genome from synthetic wheat lines in anther culture responses. Plant Breeding 112: 76–79.
  • HE DG, and OUYANG JW. 1984. Callus and plantlet formation from cultured wheat anthers at different developmental stages. Plant Science Letters 33: 71–79.
  • HU TC, and KASHA KJ. 1997. Improvement of isolated microspore culture of wheat Triticum aestivum L. through ovary co-culture. Plant Cell Reports 16: 520–525.
  • HENNAWY EI, ABDALLA AF, SHAFEY SA, and AL-ASHKAR IM. 2011. Production of doubled haploid wheat lines (Triticum aestivum L.) using anther culture technique. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 56: 63–72.
  • INAGAKI MN, PFEIFFER, WH, MERGOUM M, MUJEEB-KAZI A, and LUKASZEWSKI AJ. 1997. Effects of D-genome chromosomes on crossability of hexaploid triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) with maize. Plant Breeding 116: 387–389.
  • JAUHAR PP. 2003. Haploid and doubled haploid production in durum wheat by anther culture. In: Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I. (eds.) Doubled haploid production in crop plants, 167–172. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
  • JAUHAR PP, XU SS, and BAENZIGER PS. 2009. Haploidy in cultivated wheats: induction and utility in basic and applied research. Crop Science 49: 737–755.
  • KALTSIKES PJ, EVANS L, and BUSHUK W. 1968. Durum-type wheat with high bread-making quality. Science 129 (3811): 211–213.
  • KASHA KJ, HU TC, ORO R, SIMION E, and SHIM YS. 2001. Nuclear fusion leads to chromosome doubling during mannitol pretreatment of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) microspores. Journal of Experimental Botany 359: 1227–1238.
  • KASHA KJ, and MALUSZYNSKI M. 2003. Production of doubled haploids in crop plants. An introduction. In: Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko, I. (eds.) Doubled haploid production in crop plants, 1–4. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
  • KNUDSEN S, DUE IK, and ANDERSEN SB. 1989. Components of response in barley anther culture. Plant Breeding 103: 241–246.
  • LABBANI Z, DE BUYSER J, and PICARD E. 2007. Effect of mannitol pre-treatment to improve green plant regeneration on isolated microspore culture in Triticum turgidum ssp. durum cv. ‘Jennah Khetifa’. Plant Breeding 126: 565–568.
  • LAZARIDOU TB, LITHOURGIDIS AS, KOTZAMANIDIS ST, and ROUPAKIAS DG. 2005. Anther culture response of barley genotypes to cold pre-treatments and culture media. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 52: 696-699.
  • LANTOS C, WEYEN J, ORSINI JM, HEIKE G, BERND S, VOLKER L,
  • KONTOWSKI S, JACOBI A, MIHALY R, BROUGHTON S, and PAUK J. 2013. Efficient application of in vitro anther culture for different European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding programs. Plant Breeding 132: 149–154.
  • MUJEEB-KAZI A, AHMED J, GULAND A, and MIRZA JI. 2006. Haploid production variation in several durum wheat cultivars and their synthetic hexaploid derivatives. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38: 407–415.
  • MURASHIGE T, and SKOOG F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.
  • OUYANG YW, HE DG, FENG GH, and JIA SE. 1987. The response of anther culture to culture temperature varies with growth conditions of anther donor plants. Plant Science 49: 145–148.
  • OUYANG JW, JIA SE, ZHANG C, CHEN X, and FEN G. 1989. A new synthetic medium (W14) for wheat anther culture. Annual Report, 91–92. Institute of Genetics, Academia Sinica, Beijing.
  • PATEL M, DARVEY NL, MARSHAL DR, and BERRY JO. 2004. Optimization of culture condition for improved plant regeneration efficiency from wheat microspore culture. Euphytica 140: 197–204.
  • RITALA A, MANNONEN L, and OKSMAN-CALDENTEY KM. 2001. Factors affecting the regeneration capacity of isolated barley microspores (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Cell Reports 20: 403–407.
  • RIZKALLA AA, AL-ANSARY AMF, ATTIA SAA, HAIBA AAA, and NASSEEF JE. 2012. Response of some Egyptian and introduced wheat hybrids to androgenic process. International Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 205–214.
  • SCAGLIUSI SM. 2014. Establishing isolated microspore culture to produce doubled haploid plants in Brazilian wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Australian Journal of Crop Science 8: 887–894.
  • SHIM YS, KASHA KI, SIMI E, and LETARTE J. 2006. The relationship between induction of embryogenesis and chromosome doubling in microspore cultures. Protoplasma 228: 79–86.
  • SORIANO M, CISTUE L, VALLE MP, and CASTILLO AM, 2007. Effects of colchicine on anther and microspore culture of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 91: 225–234.
  • SZAKACS E, KOVACS G, PAUK J, and BARNABAS B. 1988. Substitution analysis of callus induction and plant regeneration from anther culture in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Reports 7: 127–129.
  • TERSI M, XYNIAS IN, GOULI-VAVDINOUDI E, and ROUPAKIAS DG. 2005. Effect of genome, induction medium and temperature prereatment on green plant production in durum (Triticum turgidum var. durum) x bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell) crosses. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 27: 641–649.
  • TUVESSON S, LJUNGBERG A, JOHANSOON N, KARLSSON KE, SUIJS LW, and JOSSET JP. 2000. Large-scale production of wheat and triticale double haploids through the use of a single-anther culture method. Plant Breeding 119: 455–459.
  • XYNIAS IN, ZAMANI IA, GOULI-VAVDINOUDI E, and ROUPAKIAS DG. 2001. Effect of cold pre-treatment and incubation temperature on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther culture. Cereal Research Communications 29: 331–338.
  • ZADOKS JC, CHANG TT, and KONZAK CF. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415–421.
  • ZAMANI I, GOULI-VAVDINOUDI E, and ROUPAKIAS DG. 1998. Antherculture of Greek bread wheat cultivars and their F1 hybrids. In: Abstracts of 7th Conference of the Hellenic Genetics and Plant Breeding Society. October 21–23, 1998, Heraklio, Greece.
  • ZHUANG J, and JIA X. 1983. Increasing differentiation frequencies in wheat pollen callus. In: Hu, H., and Vega, M.R. (eds.) Cell and Tissue Culture techniques for Cereal crop Improvement, 413–432. Sinica Science Press. Beijing.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-013c87ab-df83-456b-a8fe-15dc0a6b05a2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.