Czynniki wartości ziemi rolnej w kontekście zróżnicowanych funkcji obszarów wiejskich w Polsce

• Autorzy: Czyzewski B. , Trojanek R.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Drivers of agricultural land prices in terms of different functions of rural areas in Poland

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Dotychczasowe badania dowodzą, że subsydia oderwane od produkcji kapitalizują się w wartości ziemi rolnej. Większość tych badań prowadzonych w Europie dotyczy jednak sytemu SPS obowiązującego w „starych” krajach członkowskich UE-15, gdzie rozpoznane są marginalne zmiany wartości ziemi w wyniku subsydiowania rolnictwa oraz problem zakresu oddziaływania polityki rolnej na rynki (problem of the incidence of agricultural policy). Natomiast w systemie SA PS, w nowych krajach członkowskich UE-12, kwestie te nie są dostatecznie zbadane. Dlatego też Autorzy podjęli próbę uzupełnienia wskazanych luk, prowadząc badania determinant wartości ziemi w wiodącym rolniczym regionie Polski na próbie 653 transakcji z lat 2010-2013. Celem badań jest odpowiedź na pytanie, jak wartości użytkowe gruntu, użyteczności pozarolnicze (amenities) i płatności za dobra publiczne kapitalizują się w wartości ziemi w systemie SA PS?Autorzy stawiają hipotezę, że kluczowe dla wartości ziemi są czynniki lokalizacyjne zidentyfikowane według ekonomicznej funkcji danego obszaru. W pierwszym etapie oszacowano funkcję regresji postaci log-liniowej dla poszczególnych typów gmin wiejskich. W modelu uwzględniono zarówno czynniki cenotwórcze działek, jak i zmienne odnoszące się do polityki rolnej. Zaobserwowano m.in., że jednolita płatność obszarowa pozytywnie wpływa obecnie na wartość ziemi jedynie na obszarach peryferyjnych, natomiast płatności za dobra publiczne w systemie SA PS dekapitalizują wartość ziemi, ponieważ nie rekompensują kosztów utraconych korzyści związanych z alternatywnymi możliwościami realizacji renty gruntowej.

EN

According to many researches, decoupled CAP subsidies capitalised on land prices. Most studies on land prices carried out in Europe relate to the SPS system and marginal changes in land values are noted as a result of the subsidising of agriculture. In the SA PS system, used in the new EU-12 Member States, these issues have not been sufficiently investigated. An attempt is made to fill these gaps by studying the drivers of land values in a leading agricultural region of Poland based on a sample of 653 transactions from the years 2010-2013. The aim is to establish what land use values, amenities and payments for public goods contribute to land values in the SA PS system. The hypothesis is proposed that the key factors for land value are location-specific factors identified according to the economic functions of a given area. Thus, four log-linear models of hedonic regression are estimated (using GLS ) for different types of rural areas. The models employ both parcel-level attributes and agricultural policy variables. Results include the observation that single area payments contribute now to land value mainly in the peripheral areas and payments for public goods under SA PS decapitalize the value of land, because they do not compensate for the opportunity costs related to alternative ways of deriving rent from the land.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: s.3-25,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Czyzewski B.

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny, Poznań

autor

Trojanek R.

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny, Poznań

Bibliografia

• Abdulai, A., Owusu, V., Goetz, R. (2011). Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures: theoretical and empirical analyses. Journal of Development Economics, vol. 96, s. 66–78.
• Adrian, T., Shin, H.S. (2010), Liquidity and Leverage, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 328. http://www. newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/ sr328.pdf (accessed May 11, 2013).
• Allen, D.W., Lueck, D. (2003). The Nature of the Farm.
• Atkinson, A., Stiglitz, J. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 483-487.
• Bárcena, A., Katz, J., Morales, C., Schaper, M. (2004). Los transgénicos en América Latina y el Caribe un debate abierto, United Nations. In: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (Ed.), CEPAL, Santiago de Chile.
• Barnard, C.H. (2000). Agriculture and the Rural Economy: Urbanization Affects a Large Share of Farmland. Rural Conditions and Trends, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 57-63.
• Breustedt, G., Habermann, H. (2011). The Incidence of EU Per-Hectare Payments on Farmland Rental Rates: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of German Farm-Level Data, Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 225–243, DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00286.x.
• Briggeman, B.C., Gunderson, M.A., Gloy, B.A. (2009). The Financial Health of Agricultural Lenders, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1406-1413.
• Buchanan J.M. (1968). The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Chicago: Rand McNally.
• Capozza, D.R., Helsley, R.W. (1989). The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth. Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 295-306.
• Carreño, L., Frank, F.C., Viglizzo, E.F. (2012), Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 154, pp. 68–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.019.
• Carson, R.T., Czajkowski, M., (2014). The Discrete Choice Experiment Approach to Environmental Contingent Valuation. In: Handbook of Choice Modelling, ed. S. Hess and A. Daly. Northampton, MA: Elgar.
• Choumert, J., Phélinas, P. (2015). Determinants of agricultural land values in Argentina. Ecological Economics, vol. 110, pp. 134-140.
• Chryst, W.E. (1965). Land values and agricultural income: A paradox?. J. Farm Econ., vol. 47, pp. 1265-1273.
• Ciaian, P., Kancs, D.A. (2012). The capitalization of area payments into farmland rents: Micro evidence from the new EU member states. Canadian J. Agric. Econ., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 517-540.
• Colwell, P., Dilmore, G. (1999). Who was First: An Examination of an Early Hedonic Study. Land Economics, vol. 75, pp. 620-626.
• Coulson, E. (2008). Monograph on Hedonic Estimation and Housing Markets. Department of Economics, Penn State University.
• Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., La Riviere, J. (2014). The Effects Of Experience On Preferences: Theory And Empirics For Environmental Public Goods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 333-351; DOI: 10.1093/Ajae/Aau087. Published Online October 29, 2014.
• De la Fuente, E.B., Suárez, S.A., Ghersa, C.M. (2006). Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 115, pp. 229-236.
• Delbecq, B.A., Kuethe, T.H., Borchers, A.M. (2014). Identifying the Extent of the Urban Fringe and Its Impact on Agricultural Land Values. Land Economics, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 587-600.
• Duvivier, R., Gaspart, F., de Frahan, B.H. (2005). A Panel Data Analysis of the Determinants of Farmland Price: An Application to the Effects of the 1992 Cap Reform in Belgium.
• Falconer, K., Ward, N. (2000). Using modulation to green the CAP: the UK case. Land Use Policy, vol. 17, pp. 269-277.
• Faux, J., Perry, G.M. (1999). Estimating irrigation water value using hedonic price analysis: a case study in Malheur County, Oregon. Land Econ. 75, 440–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3147189.
• Featherstone, A., Baker, T. (1987). An Examination of Farm Sector Real Asset Dynamics: 1910–85. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 532-546.
• Flanders, A., White, F.C., Escalante, C.L. (2004). Equilibrium of Land Values from Agricultural and General Economic Factors for Cropland and Pasture Capitalization in Georgia. Journal of Agribusiness, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 49-60.
• Fuchs, C. (2002). The influence of per-hectare premiums on prices for rented agricultural area and on agricultural land prices. Agrarwirtschaft, vol. 51, pp. 396–404.
• Gavier-Pizarro, G.I., Calamari, N.C., Thompson, J.J., Canavelli, S.B., Solari, L.M., Decarre, J., Goijman, A.P., Suarez, R.P., Bernardos, J.N., Zaccagnini, M.E. (2012). Expansion and intensification of row crop agriculture in the Pampas and Espinal of Argentina can reduce ecosystem service provision by changing avian density. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 154, pp. 44–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.013.
• Goodwin, B.K., Mishra, A.K., Ortalo-Magné, F.N. (2003). What’s wrong with our models of agricultural land values?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 85, pp. 744-752.
• Guyomard, H., Le Mouël, C., Gohin, A. (2004). Impacts of alternative income support schemes on multiple policy goals. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 125-148.
• Harris, D.G. (1977). Inflation-indexed price supports and land values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 59, pp. 489-495.
• Head J.G. (1962). Public Goods and Public Policy, Public Finance, no. 17.
• Hennessy, D.A. (1998), The production effects of agricultural income support policies under uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 80, pp. 46-57.
• Herriges, J.A., Barickman, N.E., Shogren, J.F. (1992). The implicit value of corn base acreage. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 74, pp. 50-58.
• Ifft, J., Kuethe, T., Morehart, M. (2015). The impact of decoupled payments on U.S. cropland values. Agricultural Economics, vol. 46, pp. 643-652.
• Kaminski, J., Kan, I., Fleischer, A. (2012). A Structural Land-Use Analysis Of Agricultural Adaptation To Climate Change: A Proactive Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 70-93. DOI: 10.1093/Ajae/Aas075. Published Online October 18, 2012.
• Karlsson J., Nilsson P. (2014). Capitalisation of Single Farm Payment on farm price: an analysis of Swedish farm prices using farm-level data. European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 41(2), pp. 279-300.
• Kirwan, B.E. (2009). The incidence of U.S. agricultural subsidies on farmland rental rates. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 117, pp. 138-164.
• Koundouri, P., Laukkanen, M., Myyrä, S., Nauges, C. (2009). The effects of EU agricultural policy changes on farmers’ risk attitudes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 36, pp. 53-77.
• Lancaster, K.J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 74, pp. 132-157.
• Latruffe, L., Doucha, T., Le Mouël, C., Medonos, T., Voltr, V. (2008). Capitalisation of the government support in agricultural land prices in the Czech Republic. Czech Agric. Econ., vol. 54, pp. 451-460.
• Latruffe, L., Le Mouël, C. (2009). Capitalization of government support in agricultural land prices: What do we know?. J. Econ. Surv., vol. 23, pp. 659-691.
• Leguizamón, A. (2013). Modifying Argentina: GM soy and socio-environmental change. Geoforum, vol. 53, pp. 149-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.001.
• Lence, S.H., Mishra, A.K. (2003). The impacts of different farm programs on cash rents. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 85, pp. 753-761.
• Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., Boehlje, M. (1986). The Impact of Farmland Price Changes on Farm Size and Financial Structure. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 68, no 4, pp. 838-848.
• Ma, S., Swinton, S.M. (2012). Hedonic valuation of farmland using sale prices versus appraised values. Land Econ. no. 88, pp. 1-15.
• MacDonald, J., Korb, P., Hoppe, R. (2013). Farm Size and the Organization of U.S. Crop Farming, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Report no. 152.
• Maddison, D. (2000). A hedonic analysis of agricultural land prices in England and Wales. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., no. 27, pp. 519-532.
• Malpezzi, S. (2003). Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review, in Housing Economics and Public Policy: Essays in honor of Duncan Maclennan. (red.) T. O’Sullivan, K. Gibb, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Miranowski, J., Hammes, B. (1984). Implicit Prices of Soil Characteristics for Farmland in Iowa. Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
• Myyrä, S., Pietola, K., Yli-Halla, M. (2007). Exploring long-term land improvements under land tenure insecurity. Agricultural Systems, vol. 92, pp. 63-75.
• Nickerson, C., Morehart, M., Kuethe, T., Beckman, J., Ifft, Williams, R. (2012). Trends in U.S. Farmland Values and Ownership. Economic Information Bulletin, no. 92.
• Nilsson P., Johansson S. (2013). Location determinants of agricultural land prices, Jahrb Reg wiss 33, pp. 1-21.
• Nivens, H.D., Kastens, T.L., Dhuyvetter, K.C., Featherstone, A.M. (2002). Using satellite imagery in predicting Kansas farmland values. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. pp. 464-480.
• O’Dea, C. (2013). Lawmakers look to restrict farmland tax break to working farmers. NJ Spotlight. http://www.njspotlight. com/stories/13/03/01/farmland-assessment/ (accessed 28 February 2014).
• O’Neill, S., Hanrahan, K. (2012). Decoupling of agricultural support payments: the impact on land market participation decisions. European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 639–659. DOI:10.1093/erae/jbr064 Advance Access Publication 22 November 2011.
• Palmquist, R.B., Danielson, L.E. (1989). A hedonic study of the effects of erosion control and drainage on farmland values. Am. J. Agric. Econ. no. 71, pp. 55-62.
• Patton, M., Kostov, P., McErlean, S., Moss, J. (2008). Assessing the influence of direct payments on the rental value of agricultural land, Food Policy, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 397-405.
• Pengue, W.A. (2005a). Transgenic crops in Argentina: the ecological and social debt. Biulletin OF SCIEN CE, TECHNOLO GY & Society, vol. 25, pp. 314-322.
• Plaxico, J., Kletke, D. (1979). The Value of Unrealized Farm Land Capital Gains. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61, pp. 327-330.
• Rajan, R., Ramchara, R. (2012). The Anatomy of a Credit Crisis: The Boom and Bust in Farm Land Prices in the United States in the 1920s. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 18027.
• Roberts, M.J., Kirwan, B., Hopkins, J. (2003). The incidence of government program payments on agricultural land rents: The challenges of identification. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 85, pp. 762-769.
• Rosen, R. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, pp. 34-55
• Rude, J. (2000). An examination of nearly green programs: case study for Canada. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 82, pp. 755-761.
• Rutherford, T.F., Whalley, J., Wigle, R.M. (1990). Capitalization, conditionality, and dilution: land prices and the US wheat program. Journal Policy Model 12(3), pp. 605-622.
• Sherrick, B., Kuethe, T. (2014). Impact of Recent Changes in the Illinois Farmland Assessment Act. Farmdoc Daily. http:// farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2014/01/impactsrecent-changes-illinois-farmland-assessment-act.html (accessed 28 February 2014).
• Sotomayer, N. L., Ellinger, P. N. and Barry, P. J. (2000). Choice among leasing contracts in farm real estate. Agricultural Finance Review, vol. 60, pp. 71-84.
• Soule, M.J., Tegene, A., Wiebe, K.D. (2000). Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 82, pp. 993-1005.
• Swinbank, A., Daugbjerg, C. (2006), The 2003 CAP reform: accommodating WTO pressures. Comparative European Politics, vol. 4, pp. 47-64.
• Towe, C., Tera, C.I. (2013). Vegetable spirits and energy policy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 95, pp. 1-16.
• Troncoso, J.L., Aguirre, M., Manriquez, P., Labarra, V., Ormazábal, Y. (2010). Influence of physical attributes on the price of land: the case of the Province of Talca, Chile. Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria, vol. 37, pp. 105-112.
• Wasson, J.R., McLeod, D.M., Bastian, Ch.T., Rashford, B.S. (2013). The Effects of Environmental Amenities on Agricultural Land Values. Land Economics, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 466-478.
• Weber, J.G., Key, N. (2014). Dowealth Gains From Land Appreciation Cause Farmers To Expand Acreage Or Buy Land?. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1334–1348; DOI: 10.1093/Ajae/Aau019 Published Online May 11, 2014.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/00441600.1203336